Monday, January 21, 2008

The Trolls Celebrate MLK

There is nothing racist in that statement. It is an opinion on the 2008 Presidential Race in a year where honest opinions matter to the masses.
Henry | Homepage | 01.21.08 - 12:45 am | #

I shall explain something to you, Ramrod. I know fully well that those blue highlights are "links". But those links are crap. They prove nothing. And I love it when people like Yakki scream that Hannity "is a racist, it's not even debateable anymore". Shut down debate - standard tool of the left. For some reason, they think they have the power to close debate about anything. Well, you don't.
liberal lad, it's still a lie. I understand perfectly well when various lefty whack jobs try to smear anybody who doesn't kowtow to the PC dogma.

"If MLK were alive today, he would call Hannity a racist..." Antoinette, you can't speak for the dead. You have no idea what MLK would say, and neither do I. Neither does anybody else.
ROFL!!!!



Oh Yeah Neal Is Really "Insecure"....


He just loves showing the far left how out of touch they truly are


All one has to do is simply read through these threads and see how correct Neal is with his asessments eh?

.

ANd Boortz got the info from the CBO. Try it. You'll like it.
Are political polls accurate? CA recall study of 20 polls says...NEVER TRUST POLLS AGAIN!

Ah, the omnipresent poll. The media punditocracy is addicted to using polls to tell us what "the American people feel" (never think) about everything from a president's so-called approval rating, to how a candidate's chances stack up against others in a race, to our "feelings" about various policy and social issues. Although the public has absolutely no way to evaluate the vast majority of polls for accuracy, most of us simply accept them as incontrovertible indicators of truth. Why? The answer probably is because we're told that polls are "scientific" since they use statistical-type analysis, and most of us tend to equate science with a search for objective truth.

Despite the scientific patina of a Margin of Error, how does one incontrovertibly prove a poll to be accurate? For nearly all polls, the answer is that it can't be done. In the political realm, only polls taken closest to an election can be compared for accuracy to the actual results of real voters expressing their real attitudes at the ballot box.

Nevertheless, the public is conditioned not to look too closely at the accuracy of polls. We're told polls are "just a snapshot in time." So we learn to shrug when there are big swings in, say, a president's "approval ratings" from one month to the next even though nothing particularly new happened during that time. Despite the fact that only a handful of polls close to elections can be verified against objective results of real votes, polls affect our society in several ways. The worst is that many politicians, hanging on their every nuance, too often make crucial policy decisions based on polls wielded like clubs by the media and special-interest groups.

So what's the truth about polls? Few in the public have the time or resources to do an in-depth study in an attempt to answer that question, while those who butter their bread on the back of polls have no incentive to do so. Ah, but fate stepped in this year in the form of the California Recall and provided an excellent opportunity to do a case study of multiple polls taken in a highly compressed period of time. Since all poll results in this study were obtained relatively close to Election Day, a comparison to actual election results is not only easier, but also more instructive than, say, an apples-to-oranges comparison of a year's worth of "approval ratings" to an election outcome.

We all know how the news hounds love to throw out useless polling data. The fact is that polls are all rigged in the direction of the pollmaster.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focu...s/1004883/ posts

Did Diebold Help Hillary Rig New Hampshire Or Was It The Bradley Effect?
Did Diebold Help Hillary Rig New Hampshire Or Was It The Bradley Effect?

I know, you're probably thinking: "Wait a second, I thought Diebold was supposed to be a firm that was in the bag for Republicans, so why would they be helping Hillary Clinton steal the election in New Hampshire?"

I have no idea, but when Hillary took New Hampshire despite poll after poll after poll that indicated Obama would win, I knew that liberals would say the fix was in -- and I wasn't disappointed.

http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt3...p? comments=show

Well let's check out th top stories here in houndville.
The top four include three of the same topic. outrageous rantings form the pooper scoopers and then there is one on rigging polls and boortz.

It is clear to see that no one pays attention to the driveling and sniveling drooling of the hounds. Yes they along with moveon and mediamatters have become yesterdays poop paper in the puppy corner.
The point is single women want the nanny state to provide for them and this what Hillary promises.
You think they are voting for Hillary because they are intellectual geniuses who really know what the issues are?

I never said ALL women. But a large number of single women will in fact vote for Hillary because of the reasons previously stated. They want the govt to help with their daycare and many receive EITC.

These and other entitlement programs will continue to increase and will eventually become a burden to all americans.

Ahh. Mr insult is back. Have a nice day.
Please. Get a clue. I stated my opinion.
I did my own research. Surely tou can do the same.
It proves that they voted for Hillary. It is up to each of us to decide WHY they may have voted for her. I choose to believe they do it because, like many voters, they will vote for the person who promises them the most help from the govt.
I don't have to back it up. It's my opinion that most single women who vote for Hillary will vote for her because of what she promises and she promises more govt.
If you want to talk about Hillary, move over to the Home and Garden site!

You don't think some people vote based on what they think the govt can give them?
Does everything have to be spelled out for you? WHat? Are you in the 5th grade?
That post was only referring to women which was the topic at the time.
Your comprehension skills are seriously lacking.

Most voters don't read up on the issues.
A Great Point of Course


It has become downright comical to see just what Hillary will promise next to attempt to win.....

.
ROFL!!!



From the Village Idiot john t no less...


Hey johnny......Please give us a heads up when you plan to actually come up with an "Intelligent" comment of your own


I've been here for years sport and I have yet to see you ever post anything that even remotely shows that you have even the slightest modicum of intelligence


johnny you are a Dullard of the highest degree eh?

.
LOL!!!!


You are Delusional sport....


Take your tin foil hat off and seek professional help son.

.

LOL!!!!


Oh Please....


Hillary offers cold hard Cash....


Haven't you heard?

.

LMAO!!!!


Opps!!!


Looks like I've pissed off the Villiage Idiot johnny......


Sorry champ......I call'em like I see'em and you are a blithering Idiot


Maybe if you had the intelligence to get an education and not run off and joined the union eh?

.

LOL!!!!


Well of Course you do.....


You're a liberal


You people fail to believe in common sense and rational thought eh?

.
ROFL!!!!!



Not on Your Best day and my Worst sport....


You are a Poven Dullard and every last soul that visits this strange little place knows it to be true


You could not best a hamster champ...

.
LOL!!!


Poor little johnny.....


Flailing about in the Darkness attempting to keep up with the smart people


It's ok little washed up old union man.....there are many who are needed to work with their hands rather than their brains.


You just happen to be one of them eh?

.

Children have health care as do the welfare folks. Most small business owners don't have health care. Disabled folks have health care.
You people should look at the toxic waste that you type.


Prisoners have Great health care.
You clowns are out of touch.



Voting in stupid outrageous quote polls... SAD...

Green Bay lost ... LMAO !!!

I love it.

Wisconsin which is one of the most liberal states lost. Bummer for the libs in Wisconsin.

Too bad libs in Wisconsin, it isn't Brett Farve's year.

Bye Bye Packers, time to go home.

Nothing makes me more happy than to see liberals suffer, pissed off and angry.

I wish no joy for liberals.

LOL ...

Yes, Eli Manning who grew in New Orleans and went to college at Ole Miss is heading to the Super Bowl.
Hello ... McFly ... I live in Georgia. But I will let you in on a secret about football because you are probally one of the dorks that don't follow sports because you were one of those nerdy kids growing up that didn't play sports. You were the kid that got his ass kicked at school and had his lunch money taken. That's OK, because the vast majority of liberals grew up just like you.

Anyway, the vast majority of red-blooded American males follow NCAA football over the NFL. And in NCAA football here are the BCS Champs since 1998.

2007 LSU
2006 Florida
2005 Texas
2004 Southern California
2003 LSU
2002 Ohio State
2001 Miami (Fla.)
2000 Oklahoma
1999 Florida State
1998 Tennessee

6 of the champs are from the South and only 1 (Ohio State) is from the North. And LSU has won twice, which make 7 times the South won.

THE SOUTH RULES !!

WHO'S YOUR DADDY? Not the North!

lmao ...
lol ...

Soccer.....would be the sport that defines true world champions....
Just saying...
Patriot Actor | 01.21.08 - 10:03 am


Soccer is for faggots that can't play football. Small, weak homos that are afraid to get hit. LMAO ...

And which sport draws more fans in America? NASCAR

And NASCAR is from the South.

Real men who are not afraid to drive 200 MPH.

Again, liberals don't like NASCAR because they are weak and afraid. NO BALLS!


From 1978 - 1997 (20 years), only 4 NCAA teams from the North were considered National Champs.

1982 Penn St.
1986 Penn St.
1988 Notre Dame
1997 Michigan

12 of the those 20 years the Champs from the South.

THE SOUTH - 12
THE NORTH - 4

SO ... Who's Your Daddy? THE SOUTH!!

Nebraska won in 94-95 and 97 :) I guess it's no North.

Oh those three years they beat Miami of Florida, Florida and Tennessee

Question: How do you Northerners like those winters?

LMAO ...

Here are the average temps for Atlanta.
http://www.weather.com/weather/ w...mnav_undeclared

G-Dawg does it again. G-Dawg hi-jacked yet another thread. You liberals are so easy. I can make you libs jump thru my hoop anytime I wish.
LMAO ... LOL ....

And now I have libs fighting libs on this thread. Satan is correct, you people are idiots. But what Satan has forgotton, I have made him jump thru my hoops many, many times.

LMAO ...

And now I've run everyone off.

lmao ...

I ran you idiots off of your own thread, which show how weak libs are.

lol ...

LMAO ...
LOL ...
LMAO ...
I'M NOT ONLY A LEGEND, I'M THE MASTER-TROLL.
Check out AmericaBlog, one of the most liberals blog like this one.

They had a straw poll online and Edwards won. lol ...
http://www.americablog.com/2008/...straw- poll.html

That is the difference between a liberal and a plain democrat in this country. Libs pick Edwards who is the worst candidate of them all. And you libs always wonder why you are always in conflict with dems.

There needs to be 3 parties in America. Republicans, Democrats and Liberals. You libs need to start your own party.
Hey Gdawg,
Check out the weather map for America.
http://www.weather.com/maps/ news...m=wxcenter_maps

I have only one question. What about that global warming thing?
If I'm not mistaken the dog beater was a NIGGER! And he is where NIGGERS belong, in prison.

Yes Michael Vick is just like OJ Simpson, just like Mike Tyson, just like PacMan Jones. They have one thing in common, they are all NIGGERS!


I'm not a racist, I'm a realist.

Now take a look at me.
http://tinyurl.com/r2q8m
Do I look like a racist?


wow, i thought liberal blogs were supposed to be a little more civil than some of the language used by dose...if that isn't an indication that the libs are going to hell in a hand basket then nothing is. it's enjoyable to watch you all implode.


i was wondering what had her laughing so hard last night...and she was talking about shrinkage too...now it all makes sense.

i get all my material from uneducated, uninformed libs like yourself who can't sustain a debate without using foul language or trying to personally insult whoever doesn't agree with you. and you all wonder why you can't win elections.


i'll let gdawg defend himself...my guess is that g-dawg is a lib disguising himself as a right-winger so he can stir up some controversy to get people talking. otherwise this site would be real snoozer.

The best thing about the South is this ... It's the South that decides who is President.

New York, NJ, Mass, Minn, Oregon or Wisconsin don't pick the President. The South does.

How does that make you liberals feel?

And the funny part is this. There isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

lmao ..
You forgot about Clinton being a sexual predator. Oh don't take my word for it, ask the eight women that he attacked.
Wasn't Clinton a sexual predator and a draft dodger.

And now Obama IS calling him a lair.
ALthough I wouldn't call what News Hounds does "journalism", many of the comments made at this site are similar to what you have accused Fox of doing. And you somehow have the nerve to criticize Fox?

Doesn't wash.
Of course you have some sort of background regarding sociopathic loons?
If he is going to confront Bill (the disbarred lawyer) Clinton every time Bill lies, Obama will be the busiest person in America.

In my lifetime I've had the privilege of watching Magic Johnson and Larry Bird and Michael Jordan play basketball, Wayne Gretzky play hockey, Muhammed Ali box, Tom Seaver pitch, Tiger Woods golf.

And I've heard the Clintons lie.

Greatness comes in many forms .

No. I said I didn't believe News Hounds does journalism.


If Newshounds is against anti-Obama racism, then why not attack the Clinton for calling for their comments?


These kinds of statements are one of the reasons we continue to have divisions in this country. And no it's not ok for the other side.

I remeber being at a coffee shop a few years ago on MLK day, and an old man was sitting there. He said to me, " can you beleive they have a day celebrating a guy who started riots?"

I will never forget that.

MLK used to sleep with White prostitutes, he visited the Gandhi family when Mohandas hated niggers, what a stupid motherfucker.

The first "black president" falling alseep during an MLK day speach by MLK III. What a loser.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/ 0121...ream_474243.htm

Yakki, you are simply too stupid to debate with me. You wrongly assumed I'm a Christian Conservative when infact I am not. I just hate the savage bloodthirsty Mooslems.


Kim, Pb.D | Homepage | 01.21.08 - 10:35 pm | #

All Black males are essentially useless and must be carted off to an island to pick cotton.


Spare me the psycho-babble libby. You guys focus so much on Christian Conservatives, honestly, who gives a fuck about them ? Bush didn't go to War in Iraq because of them, he did so for Oil, everyone knows this. So don't put that on them. You should be focusing your efforts on the ragheads. I'm sitting a few miles north of the buildings that the ragheads flew a plane into so forgive my racism. I don't want another war but I sure as hell don't want a Muslim in the Oval Office !

The FBI is too busy trying to protect this Country from ragheads to worry about me.

On the contrary, it's you libs that need your head examined, voting for a man who's father was a Black Muslim. ?Every one of you should have your heads cut off for such treason.
I'm not trying to be intimidating you liberal faggot but hey, if you live in NYC then let me know where to meet you. I'd love to rip your throat out cocksucker.

Apart from their usual biased spin, Fox News is right about the lager point: The Republicans ARE a focused group, focused on kill, kill, kill and hate, hate, hate.

The Democrats are the unfocused group of all the others with diverse interests and priorities most of whom are Democrats only because there is no other viable political party.

Who was it who said something along the lines of "..I'm not a member of any organized political Party. I'm a Democrat."? I know exactly where he was coming from.


very much reaching on this one. i'm sure they meant nothing by using the different words.

sure he does. if he wins florida he is once again the front runner. he is also up in NY and California...two huge states with large #s of delegates. whoever he runs against in the fall will have much less experience in managing government and going after terrorists. he is not flawless but neither are obama or clinton. if they want to start playing that game rudy can punch right back. in addition, look for Jeb Bush come come along as his VP...he was probably best Governor Florida ever had one of the best our nation has ever seen. he would solidify an unbeatable ticket.

what are you afraid of? debate? if so that is pretty sad my friend. what's the point of having a forum if you can't allow for civilized discussion? you apparently are against what you say you are for...free speech.

That is only your opinion.
again, it's an opinion show people...you all are picking apart every single word and it's not a fair analysis...i'd say 99% of what they say on this show is apolitical...the one time they say something remotely open to interpretation you all act like they are reading GOP talking points.
As he didn't evolve from an ape like all the rest of us folks, I guess God must have made him. Does that mean Fox and Fiends are equating themselves with God?
ok people. I'll go through this with you one time...

when a man and a woman love each other, they lay close together.

[tasteful edit]

9 months later they have a baby. let's move on now.
When Wall Street opens tomoorrow folks, it's going be very interesting. I would advise you guys to get out of stocks if you can.

I know I will be strategizing all night before 9:30 AM EST.
AHHH

According to the Dow Jones industrial

the Blue chips only fluctuated by 52 points down

the benchmark is up 89

and
all the alts and futures are in the green except for softs and Com trade e

softs is normal thanks to NAFTA.

com trade e is only 0.01 off from yesterday.

Whats all the fuss about?
MAO

do you people even know what you are talking about?

even CNN is only reporting a 59 point drop.......

530 points LOL

futures....Hum oil is down ten dollars, A-7 tech is up

39345 Industrial in trans pacific is up again

even the airlines are up

can anyone give me a real reason why you are freaking out Or do i get more meaningless portents like "you'll see at 8 am man"

next you'll tell me the sky is falling.
it closed at

12159.21

and

projected to open at

12099.3
well i give up guys

If i could give you access to my TD waterhouse account I would.

However

59 points is less than 1 percent of the total

http://stockcharts.com/?source=overture
http://www.cnn.com/

Look at the BIG RED Numbers

59

not 500 plus
GUYS

it has nothing to do with the number BUT it has everything to do with he percentage.

TSX is currently at 332,921,655

http://www.tsx.com/

losing 602 pints is less than 0.001 percent of the total ventures measured
fantasy overcome by logic equal BASH the non-believer
SEE

Now I am a troll

what a surprise

Next i will be that BIG dumb stupid head
this must be a left leaning site.

When you can't win with logic

Name call


Oh well the Hopeful Heretic departs to more enlightened folks.

No comments:

Total Pageviews