Wednesday, January 23, 2008

One Little... Two Little... Three Little Sock Puppets

One CANNOT underestimate the Clinton War Room. They are the masters of character assassination, planting stories in symapthetic news outlets and manufacturing scandals at right time-(i.e.Foley in 2006). Obama SHOULD NOT underestimate them and if he does he will loose badly.
My God, people, check your history of the Clinton years, and clean out your ears, and get the blinders off, and get a fucking clue!
Recodem | 01.23.08 - 9:18 am

True. Surprised the corporate handlers would allow Gingrich to tell the truth. The Clintons are the Bush regime on steroids. Everything old is new again. How about some "change" America? Hey, maybe next election Jeb can run. Then good ol' Chelsea buns can run too!

Probably reality. Something CLinton supporters share in common with NeoCons. A lack of reality.
Still...not...reading...you...
Say again! Irrational hate of Clintons caused by?!?
-can only assume ignorance-over!
Boohicky | 01.23.08 - 9:32 am | #
I can only assume that you are too young to remember the Clinton years and have not done your homework.
Ah yes. Good ol' election FRAUD done by CLintons.......imagine that

I'm not a fan of Fox news and Gingrich has the habit of saying stupid things but everything he said was correct except for the medias bias to the left.

HUH??? Fraud is fraud, doesn't matter what party they belong to.


If someone donates money and you do not claim it, it is fraud. Especially when it is in the MILLIONS! So Bush is corrupt. You want Americans to replace a corrupt regime with one that isn't "near as corrupt"??? That is stupid.
I'm sure if you research that "independent" study that Soros or the Clintons were somehow involved witht he funding. a typical liberal political hit job. what a disgrace liberals our to our country.
Wait a minute! What terroists were brought to justice under Clinton? He never got Osama when he was handed to hime on a silver platter.

I'm not going into a lot of this. But your old adage of it was only sex, doesn't sell. He was the president she was an intern. He put the country and national security at risk. And I guess I will have to explain to you how he did that. Have you ever heard of blackmail? If the wrong person or persons found about his Lewinsky in the WH they could have used it against him, and put the USA in peril. So if that doesn't sink in than keep drinking the kool aid!


preach on Recodem

How did her brothers get pardons for two felons after being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars? How did she raise $100,000 trading cattle futures? Look it up and open your eyes people. The Clintons are/were just as corrupt as Bush, but for some reason the JFK syndrome seems to glaze over logic when it comes to yet another American Royal Family. Enough is enough. No more Clintons or Bushes.

Nahh...I can't give you any proof...I go with my gut and I'm never wrong...my gut tells me that Soros and the Clintons are behind this. Just like Bush's gut told him to take out Saddam to protect our country and it proved to be right...if it walks like a duck and quacks like one...eh?

he makes his own decisions based on what he feels is right for the country and God blesses him with the intellect to make the right ones. and so far he has made most of the right decisions. we all should thank God for President Bush...
Uncle Leo | 01.23.08 - 10:36 am | #

Don't watch Hannity, and can't stand him or Faux. Just tired of people believing crap that comes out of Dems mouths, cuz they are Dems and not Reps. This voting for "the lesser of two evils" crap has got to stop. No wonder our nation is going to hell. We let them. A link? Just do a search on Clinton corruption scandals. There are pages of them. They are in no way honest.


I think Uncle Leo is right on target. God bless the president and God bless Sean Hannity for speaking truth to power every day and every night to America. He has millions of listeners and viewers for a reason.

And the way I read it, clinton had nothing to to with the capture and convictions. Have another glass of KA.


Why is so difficult for you to fathom that Billy boy put the country at risk for a blowjob?


For Christ's sake. Another Kool aid drinker that doesn't have a clue. Blackmail? Let me count the ways. Wise up dude!


Ego isn't the same as outright corruption. The Clintonites are like a damn mafia.

Really? Like the other Dem candidates say, "it's really hard to tell"
And we should be afraid, very afraid. She's more power hungry than her husband that she could not handel, how in the hell is she going to handle the country.

Wrong. The Clintons are corrupt. So is Bush, so? Bush isn't running this time on lies. Billary is.

Clinton, if elected, will grab all the power she can. And people like you will let her.
Sorry you can't handle the truth! But thanks for responding to my boredom. 99% of the people on this site are preaching to the choir. How boring is that!
Even if she's the Dem selection, I will not vote for her. It's completely hypocritical to slam Faux Snooze and the corrupt Bush Regime, and then support that rich trash.
Newt is right about the Clinton. Apparently the News Hounds don't like that he is right. BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
And most of it under a republican comgress without whom Clinton could have doen nothing.
Wearing that tin foil hat again?
Exactly right. I remember watching Clinton sign the welfare bill that was forced on him by the Republicans and later laughing and saying "We can reverse this later"! Or something to that respect.
It was the Clintons who sought out and accepted the illegal campaign
cash. They seem very willing to surround themselves with dirtbags, as
long as said dirtbags bring cash.

Clintons: Criminal scum.

Eh?
Truth: The Anti-Newshound


Simple enough for you to do also. I don't have the time and this site doesn't have the space to list all the contributions the Clinton's knowingly got illegally.
Newsweek reports that Clinton and the Democrats will no longer pursue the rich vs. middle class America class warfare strategy. They realize that it won't help them politically and, according to Newsweek, "President Clinton...doesn't really believe in it."

Newsweek noted that they are abandoning it, so apparently, they do not agree, nor do their sources. Clinton has been bashing the rich since his campaign, claiming disingenuously that they are not paying their "fair share" of taxes, i.e. falsely implying that they are paying less than they did in '80. Hillary went after the "greedy" pharmaceutical companies, after selling their stock short. They have made many self-serving moralistic statements about the "greed" of the '80's. Clinton and the Democrats condemn Republican. tax cut plans because they claim it will "help the rich."

If this is not class warfare, what is?

Clinton has pursued this strategy for about 3 years, and now he claims he **doesn't really believe in it?** Hey, I'll buy that!

Newsweek reported it as "news." How strangely non-judgmental that they would not question the sincerity of Clinton's claim when his actions speak otherwise.

Clinton's economic policies ???

1) A massive tax increase

2) "Hope" that interest rates would remain low

3) A few R & D credits for Al Gore's pet high tech industries

Was there anything else ?

In reference to the Social Security trust fund --

"But its important that we not panic; there is no immediate danger to retirement. Our accumulated surpluses would be sufficient to pay the liabilities to 2029 at current payroll tax rates."

From an interview; published in the May '95 issue of Money magazine.

Hasn't anyone told him that the Social Security trust fund has no money -- Congress borrowed it all and left IOUs with no plans yet on how to redeem those IOU's?

Given that Clinton seems so concerned about the hateful rhetoric in: politics these days, I wonder if he intends to limits such violent: statements as "taking food from the mouths of children", "war on the poor", "throwing the elderly out on the streets", and "contract _on_ America, Evil, Extreme, Mean Spirited and on and on and on.

We've given more power to states and localities and to private citizens. Our proposals would further accelerate those trends. Bill Clinton, White House press conference, 3/3/95

Fact: Clinton lobbied to defeat the Balance Budget Amendment in the Senate, so states and localities are prevented from getting the chance to even debate the amendment. His Administration opposes giving block grants to the states. He is opposing all Block Grants as well.

We support adding 100,000 new police officers. Bill Clinton, same news conference.

Fact: There are no "100,000 police officers". Never has been, never will be. Even liberal columnist DeWayne Wickam concluded in USA Today: "Many of the 100,00 cops promised in the crime bill will never materialize". On the day AFTER Clinton signed the bill into law, The New York Times reported that "some law enforcement analyst said the Administration has in effect misled local officials by vastly overstating the number of police officers who can be hired under the program".

It's called lying where I come from, how about where you came from? ??

Illegal Chinese money is a matter of public record. Easy enough for even you to find.
Come on! Bush backed the demmies up against the wall so many times it's funny.

Also if we are headed for a recession, blame the democrats, they have been in power for over a year now. Wall street is scared we may end up with a Dem pres who will raise taxes & totally screw up the economy. So investors are selling off and taking their profits before that happens.

The day is still young.
Funded by George Soros!
how about that email circulating that Obama is a muslim and that he took his oath on the Koran? you don't think the Clinton's didn't have something to do with that? in terms of proof...we don't have any "proof" that Kennedy was assassinated by someone other than Oswald...but common sense and seeing through the BS proves otherwise.
Wasn't Karl Marx all for the progressive agenda? How did that work out?
I usually like this site but even you guys have to admit the Clintons have turned this contest into what we hate about the neocons, a lying smear fest where they can winby attrition...Bill Clinton is a convicted liar, the truth has never been a friend of his and Hilary may win the battle against Obam but shehas most assuredly lost us all the war in her divide and conquer campaign
Only because she is promising them more of the nanny state.

you're somewhat right, somewhat wrong Claudo, he basically pled out to perjury charges and gave up his law license for 5 years, my bad

In fact I love a good joke....and thats just what the Clintons are.

A redneck joke gone terribly wrong.
The sad part is, there is no reason why she does except she's a woman...Her and Bill have provided us with the masterful stroke of political calculation ever...Pit Obama as the African American choice and make him fight for that(and they are really the only ones who could even figth him there) while they then can "pit him as the black choice"...very sickening indeed

Claudo, all 3 Democratic candidates are proposing the same thing for health care, with Obama's plan actually being better for working class people than Clintons due to those mandates that Hilary likes to throw out. What she doesn't mention is that we also have mandates in MA, which work great if you can afford the plans they offer, but you end up paying one way or another anyways so it ends up hurting the struggling in the long run

How about if Washington rewrites the onerous tax code in this country to allow people to have more money and allow more investment to come into the US instead of going out? 22% of the price of a car is taken up by governmetn taxes and regulations.
Two George Soros-funded groups got their BS published in the AP. The bloggers are all over this faster than Rathergate and the forged documents memos.

Funny that you couldn't give us that location. I wonder why.

Liar.

Eh?

No comments:

Total Pageviews