I got a private message from john T. asking about something
Koldys wrote on his blog after I made what was probably the 4
th or 5
th post I have ever made over there.
Mark
Koldys supports pedophiles like
Blackflon. You folks may want to think about the company you keep.
Count Istvan | Homepage | 08.01.09 - 5:03 pm | #
Koldys responded:
I allowed that
msg because if I deleted it there would be no record. And I want a record. Nobody is under any obligation to acknowledge or respond to it.
johnny dollar | Homepage | 08.01.09 - 5:06 pm
Now I do not a war with Koldys. For one thing as I have mentioned he seems to have 2 followers who leave all of his comments. John T. has told there is in fact 3. There is another loser who posts there whose life consists of watching Billo taping Billo, then re-watching Billo on the weekends. I wonder if this isn't our "friend" "Damail" I have no idea why he would want to save the post for the "record" Blackflon is an admitted pedophile Koldy's has admitted he doesn't give a shit about the quality of people he chooses to associate with. That's fine of course. It's his prerogative. But anybody who might think Mark Koldys and his little two bit blog are legitimate might want to think twice when the kind of people that they are conducting business with.
Maybe he is going to sue "Count Istvan" So be it. It's not the first time that has been threatened. And I suspect that this suit will go as far as the one threatened to Count Istvan by Ranger Bob.
One other thing John T. told me he was having trouble posting. Don't know why. You needn't register you can post as name/Id or anonymous. I would ask that if you post anonymously that you would, if you are from newshounds post your name somewhere in the text of your message. Most of the anon posts we get are from Ranger and his alter egos or Butt Boys and as soon as I see anon I am ready to delete.
Late Edit From The Count. Credit John T. Mark Koldys apparently trying to steal a man's wallet.
Thank you John.
9 comments:
Well, we all know how scary and realistic those Internet blog lawsuit threats are...
Something that any and all blogs should consider is that at the end of the day, unless you have some very carefully-worded fine print in place, you as "publisher" with veto power over what stays and what goes are liable for whatever any johnny-come-lately poster chooses to add to your blog.
And even when you're not legally liable; well, in this medium, your words and those of your devotees are all that constitute your reputation. So if you allow scurrilous nonsense to populate your blog, you're doing more damage than help to yourself.
Just saying - to J$, not to you, Count.
I agree with you. If somebody came by and and said I am going to kill that mother fucking n**ger in the White House and I left it up it would be on me although I suppose it's possible that Ranger Jolly or whatever will now come by and post it 19 pages back and I won't see it.
You make a very valid point. I know this will come as a shock to you (not really) but some of Mark Noonans foot soldiers (possibly the old fart himself) have stopped by and not only called myself names but Jonathan racial epitaphs.
Count, I am SHOCKED! SHOCKED, I tells ya, to hear that Noonan's posse has been saddling up and riding this way to berate you and J-Man.
Aren't these Internet Superfriends just so precious? In real life they wouldn't stand up in defense of a dog with fleas, but online they're all full of threat and bluster and outrage. They make Armchair Warriors and Monday-Morning Quarterbacks look like bonafide heroes. No wonder Mr. Falafel and his ilk are their idols. All hat, no cattle, as they say...
But, seriously: if you don't "own" the point of view of your internet space, you own diddly-squat. If you choose to allow unfiltered, unmoderated commentary as part of that, you have to take the consequences. Otherwise: your fence = your graffiti, whether or not you were the one with the spray paint.
And in the interest of fairness Jonathan and I have gone over to there little lemonade stand under the names of God and Jesus and played with Jeremiah. I once told him as a curse for pissing me off I was giving Obama Indiana, Virginia and North Carolina. I wonder if what Jerry's reaction was when all 3 went to Obama.
There=Their. My turn for a typo.
Count, you might enjoy this picture I found of Mark Koldys. He's the first one on left. The one that looks like he's trying to steal the guys wallet in front of him, or just play with his ass. A real manly looking guy, don't you think?
john t
Well, I guess it wouldn't take the link I gave.
I'll give it to you on a PM.
john t
Looks to me like Koldys is trying some kind of Brokeback thang if you catch my drift. But the Koldys saga lives on in the two articles that News Hounds Julie wrote in the Examiner which totally skewered Koldys (about fucking time, I might add). Check out my News Hounds Forum post which splains it all. Suffice to say the Dollar buttboy trolls are coming out of the gutter to post comments on Julie's article. Anyway, keep on trucking...
Post a Comment