Monday, November 9, 2009

I Told You He Would Argue Anything

This is why I said "football" has nothing to do with the arguments that I have had with Uber Nip that he is simply just a troll who will argue anything and as such I am a damn fool for falling in his trap. Now he trying to argue killing people is not wrong.

First let me say that this question has nothing to do with our past discussions. I would ask this same question of Al, Keg, ET, Paul or Anisha.

Why is killing people wrong? What is your reasoning?
I'm not suggesting you are wrong but what is your reasoning?

Either he is suggesting there is nothing wrong with killing people or he is taking that position just to have an argument. Like I said he'll argue anything with anybody who lets him. And if I let him pull me in again shame on me.

10 comments:

Bill said...

So why don't you just answer my question over on NewsHounds?
Let my answer determine what my motive is.

Bill said...

Or we could discuss it here since you haven't closed comments like you did last time.
Your choice.
I am sinscere in asking why you think killing people is wrong.

Count Istvan said...

I am sinscere in asking why you think killing people is wrong.

Ok most of the time you're at the very least a pretty good speller so I have to assume you are just a little but uh...gassed.

How many people have you killed and felt good about? if the answer is 0 you know the answer to your question

If the answer is 1 or more on top of everything else...you're crazy.

Bill said...

Let me start.
I am not a pro death penalty type of guy. But I am not adverse to executing some people.
I understand that there are cases where a person is found guilty where guilt is not 100%. Should the gov't kill him/her?
Definately not!

If a person admits to raping and killing a ten year old and there are witnesses?
That defendant has asked to be checked out and the gov't should provide him with express service.

I don't understand the thinking that people who have no respect for childrens rights to live should have the right to live if they kill a child.
What do those people offer society?

Bill said...

I have never killed anyone but if I was a judge or a jury member that was judging a case that involved a person that confessed to and was seen to kill a child, I would not hesitate to ask for the death penalty.

But, you haven't answered my question.
What is wrong with killing a person?

Count Istvan said...

If the crime was so heinous why are you then going to turn around and commit the same crime?

Count Istvan said...

And if you don't know the answer to that question then you are a disturbed person.

Bill said...

It's okay if you don't know.
I'm older than you and I have kids. A few years ago I didn't think killing people was justified either.
But as you get older and if you have children things change.
You relize that some people are better off dead.
People die all the time.
Why should a pedophile killer live longer than a mother with pancreatic cancer?

Bill said...

"If the crime was so heinous why are you then going to turn around and commit the same crime?"

Because the crime was committed on an innocent person who did nothing or very little wrong.

The convict executed comitted a crime that you and the rest of society decided that was against the law.

I repeat, I wish the death penalty was not necessary. Like I wish abortion wasn't necessary.
But unfortunatly both are necessary in this society.

Now you know where I stand.

Now can you please answer my question?
Why is it wrong to kill a person?
Obviously you think it is wrong. I'm sure you have your reasons.

Why?

Bill said...

You said, "If the crime was so heinous why are you then going to turn around and commit the same crime?"

If I committed a crime that left my victim bedridden, would you feel bad sending me to prison for life knowing my victim was confined to a room for life?

Total Pageviews