Early Saturday morn The Count Is going out of town for 2 weeks ( More on that later) but how about some pre-vacation trollness?Fox & Friends Target John Edwards For Accepting Speaker Fee in 2006
AND WHY WOULDN'T THEY! GREAT CLIPS $12.00 SOMEONE PASS THAT ON TO HIM, K.Once again this site, one that criticizes FOX for not being fair and balanced, has deleted a post with a dissenting view.
That's their motto Just Me. "We watch and delete so you don't have to"
Actually, it is John Edwards that always speaks of "two Americas". No conservative is running a campaign like that.
So, charging a school $55K for a speech on poverty is a bit funny....
John Edwards is an ambluance chaser. And you've got to admit that the $400 haircut places him firmly in another world.
Michelle and others seem to be missing the point here.
Why am I not suprised?
The point? Tell them to check the top of their head.
Maybe this will help.
First and foremost, this is about media coverage, not about whether or not he should get paid.
However, I have found it extraordinarily hypocritical that exceedingly wealthy liberals who point their fingers at greed do everything within their power to make more money and pay as little taxes as possible.
It's not about whether or not he should get paid. Instead, if he really is such an advocate for the poor and down-trodden, why take money from a college to discuss an issue so dear to him? Why not do it pro bono?
In fact, what was interesting was how he charged UC-Davis - a state-run university -- $15,000 more than Stanford, one of the finest and wealthiest private universities in the country.
Forgive me, but if you don't see the hypocrisy here, what can I tell you?
2004 is a make-or-break election because we need to create one America again.
Bob | 05.22.07 - 8:21 pm |
I just hope we make it to 2004....
And this is only done by the right, Right? Read on Silly Boy.
Rogers plans to insert a transcript of their exchange in the Congressional Record to document the potential violation. His resolution will also require a House vote to reprimand Murtha for his comments, according to a draft received by The Politico. Rogers is expected to file it on Monday.
It does not call for an investigation by the Ethics Committee.
'The way I do it'
According to the draft resolution, Murtha shouted at and chastised Rogers on the House floor Thursday for offering a motion last week to challenge $23 million Murtha requested in an intelligence bill.
Murtha had requested the money to prevent the administration from shuttering the National Drug Intelligence Center in Johnstown, Pa., which is part of Murtha’s district.
“I hope you don’t have any earmarks in the defense appropriations bills because they are gone, and you will not get any earmarks now and forever,” Murtha told Rogers
Why bother. It would just get deleted when the threads are "cleaned up" for the night.
Why is Fox silent on this?
I guess we won't have to listen to you economic retards complain about how much money oil company stockholders or CEOs should make then.
joaquin ramirez | 05.22.07 - 7:55 pm
=
Maybe because Giuliani wasn't there to give a speech on the plight of the poor?
Just guessing.
Eh?
Eh?
You implied that we shouldn't criticize others for what they make.
If Edwards is off limits, why not Exxon's CEO?
Could it be, oh, I don't know...HYPOCRISY?
Liberals: Hypocrite lying turds.
Eh?
We're pretty sure that hypocrite Edwards didn't lose money that night.
Eh?
I'm pretty sure you know, which explains why you and the other hyperventilating trolls are in such a frenzy to defend the Breck girl.
Eh?
Liberals make a living bashing successful "rich" people. They believe that the "rich" only get "rich" off the backs of the poor, and never miss a chance to say just that.
Let's see, mega-mansion in NC, beachfront real estate, worked for a hedge fund, where he has in excess of $10 million invested, $55K speaking fees...
Conservatives believe each individual should be allowed to be as successful as he/she can, and be financially rewarded accordingly.
Liberals bash the "rich" with every breath. Conservatives celebrate the "rich" with every breath.
Understand Edward's double standard now?
Yeah, when it comes to the poor, hypocrite Edwards really feels their pain.
Eh?
No, he doesn't feel their pain. He couldn't.
Robrob, you are really thick, aren't you?
But he tells them he does. And they believe it.
I would charge as much as I could. And then double that.
But I would NEVER, EVER claim there were "two Americas, one for the rich and one for the poor".
Sometimes you simply cannot get through to some people. You and mj, by your comments, seem to be two examples of that.
Edwards apparently thinks he's one of the privileged few who should be permitted to earn $55K an hour. Anyone who does it by providing products and services that are actually useful is open to his scorn.
That's what makes him a huge hypocrite.
It's obvious that the liberal retards here are stung by Edwards do-as-I-say attitude.
Eh?
Ok That's enough of that shit. I see Bob is back on the boards.
OK.
You folks really have no idea how to have an intelligent discussion, do you?
This site just keeps getting more and more juvenile and silly. It honestly has become a total waste of time for me, since there is no thoughtful political discourse here most of the time.
I will leave it to you to continue to pat each other on the back and forgo any discussion with anyone with a differing opinion.
To call yourselves "diverse" is probably the funniest description you could use.....
Posted by: Bob at June 22, 2006 11:02 PM
I see Bob has been sharing with Rush again.
No comments:
Post a Comment