Cedarford Back?

FLC - where is your facts on GWBush
not providing insurance to the provery-stricken children of the US?
This program was started back in 1997 with a 10yr limit. You obviously didn't have a problem back then did you under the clinton's administration?

What was being passed on as the "Super-SCHIPS" would of covered all children above the proverty rate, 400% over the curreny poverty scale. So to come with your conclussion of poverty stricken children, you're vying for families that make 50-60 grand a year, to have their children covered by this new proposal and have every taxpayer pay for the uninsured children up to the age of 25. This would set up a new standard for the poverty stricken families being classified as the new poverty level: all those with a family of four and income lvl is at least 60thousand a year.
Question is when does it stop? what about those making 70-90thousand a year? or above 90k-150k a year?

The democrats used the Fost child as their poster boy to show how bad his family was without insurance, if it were not for the SCHIP program. But its been exposed that his family was well off, to include all the assets that they had, they were beyond the 400% above the poverty level. yet, what was missed, the Fost kid was already covered within his state under the current SCHIP program. Boohoo, cry me a river for trying to pull the wool over the american public with Nancy and the Dems standing next to this poor "poverty-stricken" kid.
You guys really are out of touch, and
yes, you democrats with control of the congress didn't have enough votes to override Bush's veto. Good Game Nancy.
Surgio | 10.18.07 - 10:47 pm | #

Let's see it's long it's pointless... could be cedarford.