http://www.newshounds.us/2007/11/19/fox_bashes_hillary_again_uses_robert_novak_story_yeah_we_believe_himthe_man_who_publicly_outed_valerie_plames_cover_as_a_covert_agent.php
Yes I agree the Plame story was a "Fart of Novak's Ass" and the left bottled up the stink and still pull the cork off to take whiff.
Nice headline..unfortunately somebody's cover can only be blown once and in the case of Valerie Plame that someone was Richard Armitage but that doesn't fit the agenda.
"In July 1987, the Washington Times reported that Leahy leaked secret information about a 1986 covert operation planned by the Reagan administration."
Oh bbbu..buuu...bbb.. that's...
Fist off the Leahy leaking was also reported in the "Washington Post as well. So there goes your "Moonie" Theory.
Second;
According to a 1987 San Diego Union-Tribune report, in a 1985 television appearance Leahy disclosed classified information that one of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's telephone conversations had been intercepted. The information that Leahy revealed had been used in the operation to capture the Arab terrorists who had hijacked the Achille Lauro cruise ship and killed American citizens, and the Union-Tribune claimed that Leahy's indiscretion may have cost the life of at least one of the Egyptian operatives involved in that operation.
Another example of Leahy revealing confidential information occurred just before the Iran-Contra hearings were to begin, when he allowed an NBC reporter to look through the Senate Intelligence Committee's confidential draft report on the burgeoning scandal. After NBC used the privileged information in a January 1987 report, Leahy came under increasing fire, and after a six-month internal investigation he was forced to step down from his seat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Leahy's leak was considered to be one of the most serious breaches of secrecy in the Intelligence Committee's then-10-year history.
If we didn't have that "pesky 60 vote thing" we would have surrendered by now and Al Quaeda would be in power in Iraq.
Our founding fathers were far smarter than the democrat dildos in control of congress now.
Who should I believe-Novak whose been in D.C. for decades and is well respected or corrupt Clinton war room?
More relevant than the slim shady title of this post.
Here's the deal Novak did not leak the name of a covert agent, Plame was a well-dcoumented pencil pushing desk jockey who used her status to get her hubby a name.
Wilson and Plame have been heroes and martys to bushhaters and their 15 minutes is long up. Where did Novak actually lie and Wilson was trying to bring down the president.
Just having a little fun.
What did Novak do with Plame that was actually wrong? I mean it later came out she was a pencil pushing desk jockey and her hubby was ambassador to a few African countries and his main job was making sure the toilets flushed there.
3 leakers and not 1 charged???
But good work trying to deflect Clinton crimes, by blaming the person bring it up.
This whole thing stinks of the story spread about a crazy intern that thought she had a relationship with an prez???
Strange how the same thing follows these people over and over again
You lefties really need to make up your mind.
I thought the left was all for a nuclear Iran... WTF
Hillary Clinton became the first first lady to testify before a grand jury when she was subpeonaed by the Whitewater grand jury.
Took a $100,000 bribe, camouflaged as futures trades, from Tyson Foods Inc.
Speculated in Health Care industry futures while overseeing legislative reform of same.
Failed to correct false testimony by co-defendant Ira Magaziner in Health Care trial.
Obstructed justice by ordering the shredding of Vince Foster's documents in the Rose Law Firm.
Ordered members of the Health Care Task Force to shred documents that were the target of a court probe.
Ordered the removal of documents from Vince Foster's office and told aides to lie about their removal of documents.
Obstructed justice by keeping her billing records, a document sought under subpoena, in the White House residence.
Lied to investigators about her knowledge about billing records.
Lied to investigators about her involvement in the Castle Grande land flip con.
Ordered the use of the FBI to discredit Travel Office employees.
Lied to investigators about her involvement in the firing of Travel Office Employees.
A Federal judge orders a trial on July 25, 1994 to determine if Hillary Clinton's heath care task force illegally operated in secret.
The White House finally releases more than 2,000 documents on June 25, 1996, relating to the travel office firings, originally requested two years prior by congressional investigators.
Joe Wilson was WRONG! How many google links do you need?
Now I have seen everything.
There was enough evidence to justify specific investigations on Clinton. He skated on all of them with his charisma.
You make idle speculation on the investigation of the Bush "crime family" without any specifics of what they might be investigated for.
I think this is called "Bush Derangement Syndrome."
ok sorry the clintons are totally honest
every thing that has ever occurred that is bad is because of a right wing conspiracy, i forgot where i was for a minute
its novak just making it up out of thin air with an assist from fox news the right wing conspiracy and bush probably had carl rove assist too and the result will be it helps evil corporations
There is one problem with this: It's wrong. Wilson lied and lied repeatedly. His central contention--that he had seen documents about the alleged sale and determined that
they were forgeries--was a fabrication. We know this because Wilson took his trip in February 2002 and the U.S. government did not receive those documents until October 2002. It could not have happened the way Wilson described it to Pincus.
Wilson was later confronted about his misrepresentations. He told investigators from the Senate Intelligence Committee that he may have "misspoken." CNN's Wolf Blitzer asked Wilson specifically about these obvious discrepancies, citing Pincus's June 12, 2003, Washington Post story. Wilson decided to share the blame. He pointed the finger squarely at Walter Pincus:
only when i new the truth, you going to apologize to those boys you falsely accussed?
Guess it shows who was a better judge of character in that case. I dont think the innocent should be convicted
The panel found that Wilson's report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, as he has said, bolstered the case for most intelligence analysts. And contrary to Wilson's assertions and even the government's previous statements, the CIA did not tell the White House it had qualms about the reliability of the Africa intelligence that made its way into 16 fateful words in President Bush's January 2003 State of the Union address.
Oh and here is some Joe Wilson debunking from that hotbed of right wing propaganda - Slate.com
Wilson's earlier claim to the Washington Post that, in the CIA reports and documents on the Niger case, "the dates were wrong and the names were wrong," was also false, according to the Senate report. The relevant papers were not in CIA hands until eight months after he made his trip. Wilson now lamely says he may have "misspoken" on this.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and I are happy to see you left wing Americans are standing up to the right-wing and the Satan Bush.
Keep it up and I will reward you with cheap oil. And Mahmoud will reward you by not having your head cut off when we overtake your country.
Pardons for support by an entire jewish community helped up in NY to get her in...
"The four [Hasidic men] were among roughly a dozen New Yorkers
prosecuted by the United States attorney's office in Manhattan who received
either pardons or reduced sentences from Mr. Clinton...
"A picture is worth a thousand words. These new photos undermine
Hillary Clinton's claim that she played no role in the commuted sentences
granted these criminals. If that is true, then why attend a White House
meeting evidently set up to discuss the pardons? How did these community
leaders get an invitation to the Clinton White House? The situation screams
quid pro quo" said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "These new photos
show the importance of releasing Hillary Clinton's other White House
records."
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bi...+2007,+03: 47+PM
Oh ok here's one from this past February
I got all Night.
I actually am quite close to this topic.
Oh it's the National Review..
From Joe Wilson himself;
Oh it's The Weekly Standard..
Oh it's a three year old story..
Oh you mean it's the TRUTH and you cant handle it..Oh ok.
SENATE INTELLIGENCE REPORT (page 45): The former ambassador said that he may have “misspoken” to the reporter when he said he concluded the documents were “forged.” He also said he may have become confused about his own recollection after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in March 2003 that the names and dates on the documents were not correct and may have thought he had seen the names himself.
Sorry, Joey LIED.
Here is a little reading before I drop the big one on you.
Remember "Fake but accurate"!
Just a little appetizer.
Wow! You really contribute to the discussion!You don't like the facts because of the source.
This from the site that sources and quotes "mediaMatters". Please.
All of the cable news channels were talking about this story today. I saw it on MSNBC, CNN and Fox.
Fact is what conservatives say,
opinion covers the fucked-up statements made by you jerks...
Read th whole thing and then answer this, did Joe Wilson LIE?
I like how Hillary is trying to say the GOP started this. Hillary is a snake and I hope she wins the democratic nomination ... because is she does, she will get killed by the GOP candidate running against her.
Please, Please, Please, let Hillary win the democratic nomination.For your reading pleasure.
Ummm ...I had to read it a few years ago.
Wilson was full of SHIT!
No news just the actual report which somebody also posted.
Give it a try it might do you some good.
I guess it's just another day of "Hillary bashing"........
AWESOME! Go after this bitch.
Novak's sources are impeccable. AND they are democrats which is the real reason for all the feigned outrage here from Newsclowns.
The fact you Clinton apologists do not like it, is immaterial.
Oh I see, and you have proof they are not after he turned Washington upside down the last time?
I'm betting when he says they are VERY high up democrats , you are just wringing your hands hoping he might be wrong.
The odds with the Clintons track record are against you, not Novak.
