#
22. neocon | February 14th, 2008 at 8:54 pm
Diana,
As evidenced by your post, you don’t get it. Big shocker.
Immunity for telecom companies is needed to protect them and to protect the secretive details of surveillance from becoming front page news and completely undermining the program. Are you related to Nancy Pelosi?
So the telecoms companies and their surveillance program need to be protected because the media might get a hold of them violating our 4th Amendment right of a right to privacy?
Sounds an awful lot like fascism to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment