More Trolls

You mean you didn't read what you just posted?

Eh?
Truth: The Anti-Newshound | | 01.09.08 - 8:37 pm | #

well lets just be glad the clintons are not in office or the would be a big hole in the side of our naval fleet ships just like in the USS Cole.

Of course these wacked out fox hounds take the Iran aggression as Bush fault and him provoking....

thats sad they are so hateful they can't see the obvious.
Anonymous | 01.09.08 - 9:44 pm | #
good news we can close this website down as its premis has been foiled once again by facts:

Who’s Fair and Balanced?: Fox News Channel’s coverage was more balanced toward both parties
than the broadcast networks were. On FOX, evaluations of all Democratic candidates combined were
split almost evenly – 51% positive vs. 49% negative, as were all evaluations of GOP candidates – 49%
positive vs. 51% negative, producing a perfectly balanced 50-50 split for all candidates of both parties.
On the three broadcast networks, opinion on Democratic candidates split 47% positive vs. 53%
negative, while evaluations of Republicans were more negative – 40% positive vs. 60% negative. For
both parties combined, network evaluations were almost 3 to 2 negative in tone, i.e. 41% positive vs.
59% negative.

http://www.cmpa.com/releases/ 07_...ction_Study.pdf

to bad every study that comes out proves the Fox news haters are just hatersand have no sense of reality.
myze | 01.09.08 - 9:49 pm |

i love fox news
myze | 01.09.08 - 9:52 pm | #

i stand by this scientific study done by university. Every indepentdant study i have seen shows that fox news has the most balanced news coverage.

What indepentdant fact do you have that shows the opposite?? I would love to see the analysis.
myze | 01.09.08 - 9:55 pm | #

---

Obviously if they added Gibson, Hannity, and O'Reilly, the results would be very different. And you do know that CMPA is a conservative think tank which is funded through Sciafe.

claudo | 01.09.08 - 9:54 pm | #

Oh i guess this clowno likes his Opinion Journal shows with out opinions.
myze | 01.09.08 - 9:58 pm | #

media matters is a george soros funded left wing propoganda website are you really that simple claudno
myze | 01.09.08 - 10:01 pm | #

i did its very humerous going back years to take little snippet quotes with outn painting the whole picture or containing and real study..

so obviously you can't produce any study that shows fox is biased or more biased, just opnions or snipet comments lacking the entire context

you are a farce
myze | 01.09.08 - 10:08 pm | #


you liar they sampled the 1st thrty minutes get it right and stop quoting soros cronies
myze | 01.09.08 - 10:11 pm | #

if you think the colbert report is news you have more issues than i thought claudo

question claudo how many hours a day you spend on this site, i visit occassionally and have never seen you no entering pot on her anytime i have been here

are you paid to post here ??
myze | 01.09.08 - 10:21 pm | #

Wow. The Bush Derangement Syndrome is strong in this one.

Looks like you're wrong, Hoode. Wonko gets a hard-on when Ahmadinejad appears on screen. He's "more believable"!

Eh?
Truth: The Anti-Newshound | | 01.09.08 - 10:36 pm | #