I Really Hate Hearing Things That Don't Reinforce My Hatred and Prejudice
Eh?
Saturday, December 29, 2007
Friday, December 28, 2007
Vince And His Fuck Buddy Bob Are Back
Wait a minute.
This election is about a Bumper Sticker?
Your point?
"We will learn more in coming days about the circumstances of Bhutto's death, apparently a combined shooting and suicide bombing at a political rally in Rawalpindi in which more than 20 others were also murdered. But there's little question the attack, which had every hallmark of an al Qaeda or Taliban operation, is an event with ramifications for the broader war on terror. With the jihadists losing in Iraq and having a hard time hitting the West, their strategy seems to be to make vulnerable Pakistan their principal target, and its nuclear arsenal their principal prize."
It makes perfect sense for it to be al Qaeda. All they want is to create as much instability as possible.
Obama wasted no time blaming the Clintons!
"In comments to reporters after Barack Obama's first speech Thursday, his chief strategist David Axelrod seemed to link Hillary Clinton’s vote on Iraq and the death of Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan's former prime minister. "Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq. And he warned at the time that it would divert us from Afghanistan and Al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that,” said Axelrod. "
You seem to care that Bush was in the WH for nine months prior to 9-11.
I seem to care more that OBL declared his fatwa against the USA in 1997 and the occupant of the WH then do absolutely nothing for three more years.
Seems my "care" is more relevent than your "care", eh?
Jack: If you fail to see the difference between countries declaring war against each other as happened in WWII and religous extremists killing the "infidels" because Allah told them to then there is no hope for an intelligent conversation.
The Democrats controlled the Senate in 2001
Liberals need to remember that conservatives do not act like whinny little children. We are NOT liberals.
John Edwards, the "War on Terror is nothing but a Bumper Sticker" pres candidate:
"Pakistan should continue on the path to democratization, to allow international investigators to come in to determine what happened."
Way to go, John. Treat it as a law enforcement issue. Idiot.
i'm sure the Pakis appreciate having their own investigatory abilities be dismissed by ConEdwards.
My word the nonsense from Democrats don't stop. It's bad enough with all the Democracy fethishizing that Bush does,, but this is just as bad. I could care less about democracy there... all i want to know is , is their army under sound order and chain of command, and are the nukes nice and safe.
"Democratic New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, called on President Bush to force Musharraf to step down. Until then, Richardson said the U.S. must suspend military aid to the Pakistani government. "A leader has died, but democracy must live. The United States government cannot stand by and allow Pakistan's return to democracy to be derailed or delayed by violence," Richardson said."
The fact that you do not seem to understand the difference between "must be brought to justice" and the treatment of an Islamic religous terrorist attack as a law enforcement issue only illustrates your complete lack of understanding.
So far the most recent Leftist comments are all attacks on people here.
The comments made by non Leftists have been about the issue.
Canada's new conservative government weights in:
"Bhutto's assassination could embolden Islamist military leaders in Pakistan enough to launch a coup against president Pervez Musharraf, said Louis Delvoie, Canada's former high commissioner to Pakistan.
"You would have not only no longer any effective action against the tribal areas, you would have in fact probably support for the Taliban," said Delvoie, now a senior fellow at Queen's University.
"And you would have an Islamist military government with nuclear weapons."
"That is the nightmare scenario."
There goes that theory, thanks Bob. hehe
You know as well as I that, in most cases, the liberal cannot compete in the arena of ideas, and only can resort to personal attacks instead of intelligent political discourse.
Isn't it past your bedtime?
I do not recall FNC making a statement like that. However, I think every American should consider whether they want a president that believes what happened today was nothing more than a "bumper sticker".
Don't you?
That "religion of Peace", again.
Jack who views everything in hyperpartisan terms says it's not possible to have an intelligent conversation with other people.... i guess not.. not when you're motivated by nothing except your stupid political party. you're like those talking head guests on tv who make sure they get their digs at the other side and robotically spew thier party talking points.
Bring on Hillary Rotten Clinton, her Thighness.
Bring on the sexxxy Messiah , B. Hussein Winfrey.
Bring on the Metrosexual Lawyer, ConEdwards.
The Islamic Holy Warriors will cower in fear from that Trinity of Flower Power.
Apples and oranges.. we have the 1993 folks in custody.
Some strong stuff from a Colonel Allen West:
The assassination of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto evidences who is really in command in Pakistan: Islamic terrorists and their ideology. Pervez Musharref has done nothing to promote civil liberties, constitutional order or rule of law in Pakistan. He is a despotic ruler who has been playing the Roman god Janus with the US, and indeed the world. Pakistan has received billions in US foreign aid in money and weapons support, but none of it has gone to fight against Islamic terrorism. It has been stockpiled to fight against their traditional enemy, the world's largest democratic state, India.
When Musharref ordered the withdrawal of Pakistani troops from Waziristan it allowed the establishment of a new terrorist sanctuary, a self-proclaimed "Talibanistan". The standoff at the Red Mosque earlier this month allowed us to see what happens when the radical islamists attempt to extend their ideology beyond the declared walls of sanctuary.
Benazir Bhutto knew the day she landed she was a marked woman, but her courage should embolden us to accept reality. That reality is that we face a barbaric and committed enemy which has no regard for liberty and freedoms, only their warped and insane 7th century vision of an antiquated totalitarian, imperialistic ideology. The best way to give tribute to Benazir Bhutto is to commit, as she did, to eradicate Islamic terrorism, the mysticism which holds hostage those who seek to step out of darkness, and into the light of individual freedom, not collective religious slavery.
Read the rest here
That's funny.. i was thinking that about you.. every time i come on.. there you are.
Sure is.. I bet that Iraqi pissed his pants.
G-Dawg Is Back
Ingraham is correct about the left and I think its great that Fox News and all conservative talk radio constantly expose the left-wing liberals.
Thursday, December 27, 2007
WTF?
""And again I heard the mysterious voice saying, `Son of the Republic, look and learn.' At this the dark, shadowy angel placed a trumpet to his mouth, and blew three distinct blasts; and taking water from the ocean, he sprinkled it upon Europe, Asia and Africa."
"Then my eyes beheld a fearful scene: from each of these countries arose thick, black clouds that were soon joined into one. Throughout this mass there gleamed a dark red light by which I saw hordes of armed men, who, moving with the cloud, marched by land and sailed by sea to America."
"Our country was enveloped in this volume of cloud, and I saw these vast armies devastate the whole country and burn the villages, towns and cities that I beheld springing up. As my ears listened to the thundering of the cannon, clashing of swords, and the shouts and cries of millions in mortal combat, I heard again the mysterious voice saying, `Son of the Republic, look and learn.' When the voice had ceased, the dark shadowy angel placed his trumpet once more to his mouth, and blew a long and fearful blast."
"Instantly a light as of a thousand suns shone down from above me, and pierced and broke into fragments the dark cloud which enveloped America."
I Think He's Getting Drunk
Paige Owns Vince
Pakistan is not a Muslim Nation, therefore we should accept their help in fighting Islamofascism.Vince P says: "Pakistan is not a Muslim Nation"
(That one practically begs to be added to the list of the dumbest statements that trolls have ever made)
*
I didn't say that. If you had a brain you would have dicerned that.Pakistan is not a Muslim Nation
Vince P | Homepage | 12.27.07 - 9:21 pm | #
*
More Violins For Vince
They can't help themselves. Leftists are characterized by their malignant narcissism. Thus each one has to been seen leading the Anti-Vince brigades.
So instead of just discussing things, they must get nasty and personal.
uh no.. at 8:50 someone else started by pretending to be me.
somehow it's my fault you have adults who act like frauds?
Conservative blogs comments have way more quality than this... but that's because we actually think instead of default to groupthink.
Vince | Homepage | 12.27.07 - 1:32 pm | #
Watcher, you're dealing with Leftist... They thrive in putting people in boxes, bigotry, stereotypes, thuggery, Thought Policing.
Vince P | Homepage | 12.27.07 - 2:35 pm | #
And what are the sockpuppets I have purporeted used?
Now you're calling US Military troops heartless indiscriminate killers?
Lovely.
So instead of just discussing things, they must get nasty and personal.
uh no.. at 8:50 someone else started by pretending to be me.
somehow it's my fault you have adults who act like frauds?
>It also sounds like you have called her these names on previous occasions. You were also the one lecturing us on acting mature, and then you do this.
I reply in kind.. if she wants to call me a racist, I'll consider her to be bought cheap. She is alledgeldy a conservative.
So you have no problem with people falsely stating that someone is a racist.. but you have a problem with someone accurately calling her unprincipled.. well then .. there's something wrong with your dicernment too.
It's to be expected on a site like this. On a site built on lies what to expect but liars?
Why do you always use sexual references when trying to insult women? Should we add misogynist to the list?
Jennifer | 12.27.07 - 9:43 pm | #
I didn't write the 9.40pm comment.. did you notice the URL for the homepage.
One of the open-minded tolerant compassionate leftists is doing it.
Conservative blogs comments have way more quality than this... but that's because we actually think instead of default to groupthink.
Vince | Homepage | 12.27.07 - 1:32 pm | #
Watcher, you're dealing with Leftist... They thrive in putting people in boxes, bigotry, stereotypes, thuggery, Thought Policing.
Vince P | Homepage | 12.27.07 - 2:35 pm | #
Considering that I never have used another name, you're flat out lying.
I know you don't care though.
I say whatever I want, I have no need to hide behind fake name. Though unlike open-minded tolerant compasionate Leftists, I'm not dishonest.
And what are the sockpuppets I have purporeted used?
Now you're calling US Military troops heartless indiscriminate killers?
Lovely.
Vince and Enrico
That describes you and your apparent obsession with me.
Oh, is ana coachella one of your sockpuppets? If not, then kindly mind your own business, stalker.
Eh?
Please try to keep up, dumbass. The 9/11 commission already documented the timeframe during which 9/11 was conceived, planned, and trained for...during the Clinton administration.
Eh?
Because there was no actionable information provided to Him. What was He supposed to do, tell everyone to stay home and lock their doors?
Your stupidity and willing ignorance are to be expected...you're a libtard.
Eh?
I like when you complain after every message I write... it makes me know you are reading .
One is a whore when you sell out your dignity for something you think is valuable.
So Ana who said some crap about me and black-something obviously believes in jumping on the open-minded tolerant compassionate Leftist defamation bandwagan will make her popular with her comrades.
I will reply in kind.
using the metaphor of a whore is hardly the same thing as the slander above..
Vince using Sarcasm
>I would be suspicious of everything that appears on FOX
Trust Dan Rather and his fake buy accurate reporting!
Trust the NYT and it's invented out of thin air affirmative action reporters
Trust Newsweek and its raunchy fantasty about Korans in toliets
Trust CNN and it's lack of reporting as to stay on Saddam's good side
Trust NBC and its expoding fuel tanks and suicide-inducing child-sex entrapments.
Trust Reuters and its inventive use of modern technology to create new Anti-semitic blood libels
Trust Associated Press and its new market in being the mouthpiece of our enemy.
Trust NPR - State Run Radio
A Whole Lotta Trollin Goin On Part 3
When watching MSNBC anchors other than Morning Joe show's crew you need 2 big pots of coffeebecause they are boring and repitive. At least with Fox News one can stay awake without coffee or a soda.
Media Matters was founded with help of Hillary Clinton and funded by George Soros. Yet it got portrayed as a 'media watchdog' group.
It was Al Qaida,, they have already claimed credit.
Islamists are never going to accept another female PM for Pakistan.
The guy to watch is another former PM, Shariff... He's the guy the Islamists want.. he's the one that Musariff took out of office.
Is this the ethics of you people?
SO you don;t like their smiles or they way they laugh. Now that is a great way to critique. Did they teach you taht in some government school?
Yet Musharaff is a dictator-go figure
It would be interesting to know who really owns this website... a little bit of legal discovery could turn up some interesting things.
Vince P 12.27.07 - 2:45 pm
Can you say-George Soros?-LOL
Since the early 1990s, however, its funding base has diversified to include more liberal foundations such as the Ford Foundation, Pew Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and Kaiser Family Foundation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Cen..._Public_Affairs
Fox News Channel’s coverage was more balanced toward both parties than the broadcast networks were. On FOX, evaluations of all Democratic candidates combined were split almost evenly – 51% positive vs. 49% negative, as were all evaluations of GOP candidates – 49% positive vs. 51% negative, producing a perfectly balanced 50-50 split for all candidates of both parties.
On the three broadcast networks, opinion on Democratic candidates split 47% positive vs. 53% negative, while evaluations of Republicans were more negative – 40% positive vs. 60% negative. For both parties combined, network evaluations were almost 3 to 2 negative in tone, i.e. 41% positive vs. 59% negative.
You don't like that they didn't report something on the mori=ning show? What? You couldn't wait until another show comes along and does report it. It will happen but you need an excuse to bash Fox.
Vince P
Did you catch Weasley Clark on MSNBC today blaming the USA for Bhutto's killing?
Peg: I delight to inform you that your challenge is dismissed with a laugh.
I have better things to do. You can think what you like about that place, I really don't care. How old are you, 5?
No I did not. I dont have cable , plus I'm at work.
He's still mad Clinton didn't let him bomb the Russians in Kosovo.
denial does not make the truth a falsehood.
do your self a favor and take your head out of the sand. makes breathing much easier
Al Qaeda takes credit for Bhutto assassination
By Bill RoggioDecember 27, 2007 12:26 PM
http://www.longwarjournal.org/ ar...takes_credi.php
Al Qaeda's central command is taking credit for today's successful assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. A senior al Qaeda military leader in Afghanistan has contacted Syed Saleem Shahzad, a Pakistani journalist for the Asia Times and Adnkronos International with close connections to the Taliban and al Qaeda, and bragged about killing Bhutto.
"We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat [the] mujahadeen," Mustafa Abu al Yazid, al Qaeda's commander in Afghanistan, told Mr. Shazad. The attack was reportedly ordered at the highest levels of al Qaeda.
"It is believed that the decision to kill Bhutto, who is the leader of the opposition Pakistan People's Party (PPP), was made by al-Qaeda No. 2, the Egyptian doctor, Ayman al-Zawahiri in October," Mr. Shazad also reported. "Death squads were allegedly constituted for the mission and ultimately one cell comprising a defunct Lashkar-i-Jhangvi’s Punjabi volunteer succeeded in killing Bhutto."
Mustafa Abu al Yazid has long been the leader of al Qaeda in Afghanistan. In May, Yazid was officially appointed al Qaeda's military commander in Afghanistan.
The Lashkar-e-Jhangavi and other indigenous Pakistani terror groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammned and Lashkar-e-Taiba (which is now Jamaatud Dawa) essentially serve as muscle for al Qaeda in Pakistan.
Based on the sophistication of the Bhutto assassination, al Qaeda and the Taliban were very likely assisted by infiltrators and sympathizers in the Pakistani military and Inter Services Intelligence agency.
The inncident that happened today in Pakistan is a reminder to everyone how serious the terror war is.
YOU SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CUSTODY AND LOCKED IN A PADDED CELL FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE.
oh, the irony.
thanks for a good laugh dan.
Here's a source you guys probably masturbate to
http://wonkette.com/338169/al-qa...o- assassination
DAN, THE VOICE OF THE RADICAL LEFT FRINGE.
oooh look at all the angry immature lefties attacking me, repeating the same thing over and over and over like Rainman.
Why do the Hounds never post what the 911 commission and other investigative bodies told us about Clinton and terrorism?
HOPEFULLY HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE CIA ARE WATCHING YOUR EVERY MOVE AND WILL TAKE YOU INTO CUSTODY IN QUICK ORDER. THE NATION WILL BE FAR SAFER WITH YOU LOCKED UP IN ISOLATION.
Anyone who knows anything about Al Qaida knows the United States had nothing to do with groups like Bin Ladin's.
The US funded only the local Afghan fighters... Bin Ladin and folks like him were from the Arab Middle East and there was no support given to them by the US.
In fact Bin Ladin considered the US his enemy even back then and would have nothing to do with the US even if the US wanted to work with him.
It's because you idiotic Leftists don't pay attention to the religious beliefs of Muslims that you think he doens't really mean it when he things we're the devil.
Pious Muslims do not do deals with the devil.
I'm Independent.
Where in that remark did I call anyone names? And why can't you answer the question?
We could swap quotes all day long. What will that prove?
The next conservative principle ana espouses will be her first. She thinks tax rate reductions are "racist". 'Nuff said.
ana coachella: Liar.
Eh?
Still not too bright are you? Too bad. Some of the Hounds are logical and can at least debate the issue.
Ken, try focusing. I quoted no one. I merely asked a legitimate question as to why are showing a bias against Bush when you accuse Fox of doing the same against democrats.
Paige is doing the cut and paste bit. Pay attention.
I once called Ellen and her ilk "the womyn who run this site" and Ana got all offended on their behalf. I told Ana that it is not a conservative principle to be offended on behalf of other people (because we give the other people the credit that if they are offended they're adult enough to speak up for themselves , don't need do-gooders to do it for them).
She responded as if I was speaking Klingon. I think she's conservative in the same way Bush is conservative. CINO.
paige accusing someone else of arrogance??????
had some good laughs here today. that one was the best.
Paige, thanks for the laugh sweetie!
Nothing to challenge. My point was that we could exchange quotes all day and accomplish very little.
You're not a conservative because you don't believe in anything that conservatives support.
If I'm wrong, go ahead and tell us which are your favorite conservative principles. So far, you've failed miserably at convincing anyone that you're a conservative.
Eh?
It's quite simple. As the 9/11 commission documented, the attacks were conceived, planned, and trained for on Clinton's watch. Back when the whole world loved and respected us, or so we're told.
Eh?
If I'm wrong, go ahead and tell us which are your favorite conservative principles. So far, you've failed miserably at convincing anyone that you're a conservative.
Eh?
Truth: The Anti-Newshound | Homepage | 12.27.07 - 4:21 pm | #
You "stick up for islam"...how do you feel about fundamentalist Christians?
You're "pro peace"...we were at peace on 9/10/2001 but 3000 American civilians died the next day. Were we to shrug that off, or take actions to prevent future attacks?
You're "anti-propogandic news agencies"...do you have any issues with CNN or MSNBC?
Eh?
And libtards think good conservatives are the folks who rolled over in congress for 40 years, happy just to be able to attend the Georgetown cocktail parties.
Eh?
Everyone should read about another brave woman putting up the fight against Islam. Wafa Sultan is one of my heros. She's a great brave lady.
FP: Wafa Sultan, welcome to Frontpage Interview. It is an honor and privilege to speak with you.
Sultan: I greatly appreciate the opportunity you grant me to voice my thoughts and concerns. The West must take notice of those of us who are willing to take the risk and speak up against Islamic infused hateful ideology.
FP: That's what we are here for my friend.
Let's start with your background. What has been your intellectual and spiritual journey? Who and what influenced you in your youth?
Sultan: I was born and raised in Syria as a Muslim and lived there for the first three decades of my life. It took me many years, profound life experiences and an open mind to evolve into the person I am today. My first turning point took place in 1979 when I was a medical student at the University of Aleppo in Syria, and witnessed the murder of my beloved professor by members of the Islamic brotherhood. They sprayed his body with bullets in front of my eyes while screaming, “Allah Akbar!” (Allah is great.) This experience severely traumatized me and left an indelible emotional scar on me. Since then I began questioning my religion and culture.
My second major turning point was Sep 11th. At the very first day following this hideous catastrophe, I screamed as loud as I could, “Wake up America! Islam is here”, and since then I continue to voice that message. In fact, I view every single day in the US as a turning point.
FP: I am very sorry about your beloved professor and to pry into this painful area, but do you know the reason why these murderers decided to take his life? Also, had you been a faithful Muslim until that time? Did the murder make you start thinking about Islam and your faith in a different way? Can you give us a few words on the nature of trauma that you experienced as a person, in the sense of how it changed you and affected who you would become?
Sultan: Those killers have been raised and brainwashed to treat brutally whoever they perceive to be their enemy. Prior to that incident, the Islamic brotherhood were leading a bloody campaign against the Syrian government and resolved to kill whoever belongs to the Syrian president’s religious Islamic sect as an intimidation tactic. My beloved professor was an academic figure who had nothing to do with politics, but he happened to belong to that same Islamic sect.
A few years ago, if you recall, an Egyptian man Muhammad Hidayaat walked into El AL - Israeli airline in LA Airport and randomly shot and killed two people. Did this criminal have anything personal against those victims? Of course, he did not. He was motivated by his hatred against Jews. It’s only one example to illustrate the consequences of religiously motivated hatred.
I was a faithful Muslim up to the moment I witnessed the killing of my teacher. That moment heavily traumatized me and I began to dive deeply into the Islamic texts to figure out what is the nature of G-d I have been worshiping. However, I was not able to freely express my thoughts, until I immigrated to the US where I have been exposed to various cultures and religious beliefs. It’s the power of a liberated mind that helps me to become who I am today. I started to publish my articles in Arabic at the first week I was in the US . Prior to Sep. 11th, I was warned by CAIR official not to cross the “red line.” Believe it or not, even here in America they were trying to prevent me from freely expressing myself. However, the tragedy of 9/11 released all inhibitions and fears and helped me to become who I am today.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Arti...96- E0B1A9E391A7
Go to the link to read the rest of the interview. lots more there.
A Whole Lotta Trollin Goin On Part 2
Here Paige read a little more regarding your condition:
What makes Bush Hatred completely insane however, is the almost delusional degree of unremitting certitude of Bush's evil; while simultaneously believing that the TRUE perpetrators of evil in the world are somehow good and decent human beings with the world's intersts at heart.
This psychological defense mechanism is referred to as "displacement".
One way you can usually tell that an individual is using displacement is that the emotion being displaced (e.g., anger) is all out of proportion to the reality of the situation. The purpose of displacement is to avoid having to cope with the actual reality. Instead, by using displacement, an individual is able to still experience his or her anger, but it is directed at a less threatening target than the real cause. In this way, the individual does not have to be responsible for the consequences of his/her anger and feels more safe--even thought that is not the case.
This explains the remarkable and sometimes lunatic appeasement of Islamofascists by so many governments and around the world, while they trash the US and particularly Bush. It explains why there is more emphasis on protecting the "rights" of terrorists, rather than holding them accountable for their actions (thier actions, by the way are also Bush's fault, according to those in the throes of BDS). Our soldiers in Iraq are being killed because of Bush--not because of terrorist intent and behavior. Terrorist activity itself is blamed on Bush no matter where it occurs.
Yes. And one of the symtoms of BDS is to "blame America/Bush first." No matter what the issue, they will always find a way to attribute every evil in the world to Bush or the USA. If a goat farts in Bolivia and stinks up a village, they will find a way to blame Bush for that. These people are batshit crazy.
Would you rather have Musharaff or Al Qaeda running Pakistan?
Oh without a doubt. They must be horrorfied to face the truth that Bush will be our president for a another full year. They should realize by now that even with the demorats controlling congress Bush is still the decider. Sucks for them, but what the hell, they are all insane anyway.
Yes. It's always the fault of the USA. Get help.
You beat me to it! This claudo creep probably claims to be a true American too. I've noticed he is always the leader of the 'Blame America First' pack. He is truly insane.
Jerk, if you look back over the postings you will see that the BDS lunatics started the personal name calling.
You forget the Albanians. You are one very strange woman.
Just making sure you have ALL the facts. Wouldn't want to jump to conclusions now would you?
(a) It's always America's fault.
(b) It's never America's fault.
Abby | Homepage | 12.27.07 - 12:57 pm | #
newshounds chose answer (a) everyday and twice on Sunday.
and that's a fact.
OH GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU FUCKING CRAZED LOONY TUNE!
-
Do you want your readers to believe that Fox News is the only organization that speculates?
It's pathetic how when comments are frequented by leftists how immature and innane the discussion is. It's worse than Romper Room.. my nephews treat each other better than the name-calling that comes from alledged adults.
Conservative blogs comments have way more quality than this... but that's because we actually think instead of default to groupthink.
its been made apparent that some of the regular leftists here collect the posts of dissenters. hell, may be they save every post of every thread. so, find your buddies woke and count istvan and ask them for every post by abby, wisdo, and professorduh.
there's your proof.
this coming from someone who ONLY posts comments about those that don't drink the lefty koolaid.
have you EVER posted an on topic comment? I've never seen one.Didn't Edwards and his ilk say concern for terrorism is a bumper sticker. Well that 'numper sticker' killed Mrs. Bhutto.
Afterall even with Bhutto's assassination it can be referred to just a 'bumper sticker' slogan.
The tinfoil conspiracy theorists on the left are already out in force.
B. Hussein Obama did say that we should invade Pakistan-maybe we should now-with 150 million people, many nukes and half the population there supporting al-Queda, let's follow obama's idea.
Where is Edwards today with his 'bumper sticker' slogan?
A poster on Lucianne's website stole my thunder. The Ldotters are always ahead of the curve.
B Hussein Winfrey is going to save the world!
Abby impresses all with the deep questions.
Should we invade Pakistan now? Where is Edwards today anyway?
He killed Bhutto!
I call for us Progressives to investigate Bush's murder of Bhutto!
I wonder what the percentage of those who are regulars in Bill Maher's audience even know where Pakistan is on a map? Hint: not many Yet Bush is stupid-LOL
AMERIKKKA is a Facist Police State!
WAKE UP!
The Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA) at George Mason University ..... found that Fox News Channel's evening news show provided more balanced coverage than its counterparts on the broadcast networks.Bush killed her!
Edwards is going to have his wife call Mussarff when he's on Hardball next.
Fox News Channel’s coverage was more balanced toward both parties than the broadcast networks were. On FOX, evaluations of all Democratic candidates combined were split almost evenly – 51% positive vs. 49% negative, as were all evaluations of GOP candidates – 49% positive vs. 51% negative, producing a perfectly balanced 50-50 split for all candidates of both parties.
On the three broadcast networks, opinion on Democratic candidates split 47% positive vs. 53% negative, while evaluations of Republicans were more negative – 40% positive vs. 60% negative. For both parties combined, network evaluations were almost 3 to 2 negative in tone, i.e. 41% positive vs. 59% negative
Obama, Huckabee Fare Best;
FOX Is Most Balanced (not a typo)
http://www.cmpa.com/releases.html
A Whole Lotta Trollin Goin On
The Taliban and Alkida would never allow a female leader in Pakistan.
I thought Iraq was "making the world safer"
jr | 12.27.07 - 9:40 am |
Better there than here. They would love to do the same thing here.
"The latest bombing was the second outbreak of political violence in Pakistan today. Earlier, gunmen opened fire on supporters of another former prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, from an office of the party that supports President Musharraf, killing four Sharif supporters, police said.
Mr Sharif was several kilometres away from the shooting and was on his way to Rawalpindi after attending a rally."
It makes sense that Musarrif might want Sharif dead. So that's plausible
(in another thread, someone thought Musarrif might have been responsible for the woman biting it)
i love how folks like Brian Beach anthropomorphize Fox News... like the organization itself has a point of view and the people on the air are just animated bodies with no minds.
Like CNN can be pro-anyone as long as they can get access.
Some people hate the USA so much they will believe anything.
It will be interesting to see how the Democrat candidates try to spin this.
Liar.
Eh?
Libtard dimbulbs think changing the world requires nothing more than a press conference or two.
Idiots.
Eh?
There was a time in the past when all people lived under warlords. Civilization has moved on. The uncivilized people must be converted or destroyed. The world has become too small for both to exist.
Is it respectful to start looking for political advantage, blaming President Bush or U.S. covert operations for Bhutto's assassination? I guess I missed the part where you complained about that.
Creep.
Eh?
If her point was that I am going to call you on your lies and hypocrisy every chance I get, then you're correct.
Eh?
Whatcha got?
Didn't think so.
You're letting your prejudice get the better of you.
Eh?
Get a spell-checker people. Reading these posts is giving me a headache.
Thanks for confirming that you have nothing.
Unless you're the type of libtard who thinks reductions in tax rates are "racist". In which case you're just a nut job.
You lose.
Eh?
Uh, no.
Feel free to give us a link to a Bush administration official saying that countries without civil liberties are safer.
Liar.
Eh?
Yes, and you have yet to bring anything to the table to show everyone how I'm "racist".
You've got nothing, you prejudiced loon.
Eh?
Many on this blog feel that the Middle East can live under War Lords and never need to be introduced to democracy.
The Taliban hated Ms. Bhutto for the fact that she was a woman and had threatened to kill her even before her return. Liberated women in this country is one reason we are hated by the Muslim world.
Let's go for relevance next time, Prof. Show us a quote from an administration official that says that countries without civil liberties are safer.
Eh?
I, on the other hand, can provide many quotes from President Bush's administration saying exactly the opposite of what you claim, ProfessorDuh:
"And this president saw the wisdom of removing terrorism’s cause by advocating the spread of democracy, especially in the Muslim world, where authoritarianism and repression have provided a potent growth medium for despair and anger aimed at the West. He recognized that democracy there makes us safer here."
http:// article.nationalreview.co...Mjc1ZGFhOTc5OTM
Eh?
Yes. People here often write that "those People" in the Middle East (or in this case Pakistan) have been "fighting each other for thousands of years," and anyone who expects Democracy to blossom is not realistic. Of course this is the soft racism of low expectations for people of color -- and a common liberal bias. They forget that prior to 1945, Europeans were also fighting each other for thousands of years in nationalistic, religious and tribal wars. In very recent times, a politcal assassination started World War One.
So which civil liberties did the Bush administration take away from us? The right to communicate with al Qaeda leaders in foreign countries? I'm sure we're all worried about that one!
Eh?
Yes. Bayonets. Like at 'ol Miss or the Little Rock High School -- or in Germany after WW II.
You're stupidity is breathtaking.
Terrorist threatening the security of the world.
Obama
The guy has seen the light.
I can always learn to type more carefully, but no matter what you do, you will always be an brainless idiot.
It is nice that Bush and Obama agree.
Congratulations! You're the first to truly try and blame the situation on Bush.
Your B.D.S. is eating away at few few working brain cells you have left in your pointed head.
Fucking Moron
^
Why, so the more extreme Islamist elements in Pakistan could have overthown him and taken control of their nuclear arsenal? Great idea.
Eh?
Have you and Satan been sneaking into the men's room again and licking all of the toilet seats? You know how irrational that always makes you. And as you mother said, you could get germs.
Northwoods take a peek at the short, fat, ugly, arrogant dimwit Francis. Besides playing the part of the village idiot here at the Mutts place he is also well known for scaring small children in his neighborhood.
You should be stuffed like
Trigger -- and prominently displayed in the "National Museum of Left Wing Lunatics."
You're as dumb as a box of rocks, only less articulate.
The third world taco eating wetback gives his expert opinion. You're not only stupid but insane as well, good luck with that.
Paige you have a terminal case of BDS seek professional immediately. Read more about your condition:
The psychology of some of the Bush Haters is pretty cut and dried. They hate Bush because he stands between them and the implementation of their collectivist "utopian" vision. I have no time to waste on them, except to note that their intentions are deliberately and decidedly malevolent toward this country. They want it to fail at anything and everything it does and they openly cheer for the barbarians at the gate.
They are indistinguishable from the barbarians we are actively fighting, with the only difference being that they have different ideas about which group of thugs will be in charge of the "utopia". They prefer themselves--a more secularly-oriented set of thugs--to rule.
But what about the average person on the street who has, or has come to have a visceral hatred of President Bush? Perhaps they simply didn't vote for him in 2000, believing the media propaganda or caricature of his intellect and capabilities; or perhaps they simply didn't like him because he was from the opposition party, or a Texan. or any other number of normal reasons.
It seems to me that the Democrats and the Left have used their continuous propaganda well, but there is a also a strong personal psychological factor involved in being able to convince normally sane people that the source of all evil in the world is George W. Bush.
After 9/11, in many cases, even a mild dislike of "W" rapidly morphed into the ferocious Bush hatred we are now all familiar with. The opposition to a conservative Republican; and reasonable disagreement with his policies became a swooning hysteria; and an unmitigated, deranged hatred with all the accompanying paranoid delusions.
Good post. But most of the people here are too sick with BDS to even realise the symtoms of their pathology. They truly are insane. there is no other rational explanation.
I agree, they all seem to be terminal. The sad part is they won't even face up to the fact they have a problem.
Get help. Your serotonin levels have dropped again.
Bob Says Goodbye...Still Posts
No. It is my frustration at the lack of common sense here. I post what one very radical Islamic terrorist publically stated in his Fatwa against the West in 1996, and you people immediately assume I was speaking about every single person that is a muslim. And then you proceed to quote back the Bible and Christianity to me, as if to say "look at what YOUR religion says", which is totally irrelevent, unless you quote back to me what a Christian extremist says the Bible says. And then the ineviable Timothy McViegh analogy, wherein the fact is McViegh was simply a mass murderer, not someone who murders for religous reasons. Again, totally irrelevant.
And finally, the real frustration with so many liberals. You people throw around the word "hate" like its meaning is of no importance at all. To you, "hate" constitutes any opinion that differs from your own.
You're wrong about Islam not ordering offensive warfare.. how in the world did Islam spread from Arabia to Spain and to India.. by conquest.
Qur'an:8:39 "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world)."
Qur'an:9:5 "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war."
Ishaq:587 "Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace."
Nice religion.
Taimur
The difference is this
Muslims believe that they themselves will go on a bloody conquest around the entire world, subjugating all under sharia law. They believe they will kill all the Jews, destroy Israel, and that they will destroy Christianity with the help of the Mahdi and Isa. "break the cross"
Do you deny that belief?
Christians believe that Jews/Christians wll be subject to persuctation by the Anti-chrsit, and that many of them will be killed, and that the Antichrist will cause devastation around the world and that if God himself didn't come down to earth to stop it, no one wold be saved.
So in other words.
Muslims murder other people
Jews/christians are the ones murdered
And ironically.. that situation is the same in both religion's end time belief.
If you take the bible end time and the Islamic end time and try to fit them with each other , what you get is these characters who are called different things, actually being the same person:
Bible / Islam
Antichrist / Mahdi
False Prophet / Isa (the Muslim "Jesus"
Jesus, Son of God of Israel / Dijjal
Satan / Allah
End Time Empire / Revived Caliphate
Circle: you're just showing how stupid you are.
Do you deny that many thousands of Muslims are committing acts of violence in today's world because of their religion?
Going off on tangets about bible verses is irrelevent... muslims aren't killing due to the OT. And neither is anyone else.
And Yet Bob Is Still Posting
OK.
You folks really have no idea how to have an intelligent discussion, do you?
This site just keeps getting more and more juvenile and silly. It honestly has become a total waste of time for me, since there is no thoughtful political discourse here most of the time.
I will leave it to you to continue to pat each other on the back and forgo any discussion with anyone with a differing opinion.
To call yourselves "diverse" is probably the funniest description you could use.....
Posted by: Bob at June 22, 2006 11:02 PM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
