Tuesday, February 13, 2007

To disagree with patrick is just blasthemy

Science? You have computer models that are bought and paid for by taxpayers who give them to "scientists" who come up with a theory that will require more taxpayer money. Some science.

The this stupidity is snapped up by defeated socialist like Al Gore who try to get people to give him the power through fear that he can't get at the democratic ballot box.
There is no such consensus and no facts. There are computer models and nothing else but socialist rhetoric disquised as science.

From an interview with the President of the Czech Republic:

IPCC has released its report and you say that the global warming is a false myth. How did you get this idea, Mr President?•

A: It's not my idea. Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so. It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it's a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It's neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment. Also, it's an undignified slapstick that people don't wait for the full report in May 2007 but instead respond, in such a serious way, to the summary for policymakers where all the "but's" are scratched, removed, and replaced by oversimplified theses.• This is clearly such an incredible failure of so many people, from journalists to politicians. If the European Commission is instantly going to buy such a trick, we have another very good reason to think that the countries themselves, not the Commission, should be deciding about similar issues.•

No comments:

Total Pageviews