Monday, February 19, 2007

Chickenhawks

I find it quite fascinating that there isn't a single post here explaining why you liberals think your "let's cut and run from the terrorists" position is in the best interest of the United States, just a bunch of ad-hominem attacks against people who do understand what the stakes are if we do cut and run.
hoode: Who might (enigmatic) "THEY" be? Go ahead. Cite their name. Get in-touch with REALITY. OK. I'll help. "THEY" are Islamic Radicals who are driven by an uncompromising obcession to kill Jews, Infidels, and anyone who may get in their way! As to "The only ting that could POSSIBLY help him is if we get attacked again. I dont think they would make such a tactical mistake.". NOT SO. "THEY" timed their terror slaughter in Madid to synchronize with Spain's elections. "THEY" were well aware of the Spanish electorate's aversion to confronting Islamic terror, a Leftist candidate leading in the polls, and tactically timed the bombing to push Spain to " cut & run". "THEY" were additionally not disinclined to praise the Dems winning in the Comgressional elections. "THEY" viewed that occourance as very good for them as an indication of the weakening of America's will to fight global Jihadism.

The straight-talk by Newt, offensive to the Left, reminds the Jihadists that not everyone in America is in denial and seeks to appease the greatest threat to America in our time. Newt tells it like it is. No nuance. No BS, Simply, looking the enemy ( radical Islam)in-the-eye and letting them know that there is a counter-force to their global Jihad.
USAFSS: "Seig Heil" Classic Left-wing! Avoid the facts. Attack the person. Can YOU say cognative disonance?

Graham Chapman: No Irag IS NOT the main recruiting tool for global terrorism. It is but one of the theaters-of-operations. To accept YOUR premise; Islamic fundementalism and terror in Thailand, India/Pakistan,and the Phillipines is all about Isreal. NO! What is going on in Iraq is only one of the manifestations of Jihadism.

No, the Jihadis will not "invade" New York in the traditional sense. They will detonate a dirty bomb and acheive the same objective...TERROR in their attempt to have us INFIDELS submit to their agenda.

Any indication of weakness on our behalf leads them to conclude that THEY are winning and compels them further in their global Jihad.


claudo: Good thing our foreign policy is not poll driven. Good thing it is not dictated by the Euro Lefty-weenie editorials. Good thing FOX has the courage to rise above the background noise of the Left and present an unbiased view of the threat to America by ( NOT moderate Islam) Global Jihadists.

I'm still waiting for one of you liberals to explain why you think your "let's cut and run from the terrorists" plan is in the best interests of the United States . Any of you care to even try and defend your position ? Anybody can lodge an ad-hominem attack. It's one of the first things you learn how to do in nursery school.

Graham Chapman: "Why do they need Iraq to detonate a "dirty bomb" in New York?" BECAUSE "They will detonate a dirty bomb and acheive the same objective...TERROR in their attempt to have us INFIDELS submit to their agenda"


I've read your posts Graham. And they're nothing but a bunch of left wing talking points that don't answer the question.


Graham Chapman:"You do realize that you are making no sense at all, right?" Are YOU the arbiter of what "sense" is. I really do not expect you to change your stripes. I can only hope that you may consider an alternative POV. Apperently not.


USAFSS:"Which of the various groups in Iraq are the terrorists"? THOSE SEEKING TO DESTABILIZE THE COUNTRY AND STOP THE PROGRESS ACEIVED BY OUSTING SADDAM."which are the ones fighting an occupier" SEE PRIOR REPONSE."which are the ones getting even for Saddam's reign" WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE BAATHISTS AND MINORITY SHIAS, JUST ABOUT EVERYONE ELSE HAS AN AXE TO GRIND.

USAFSS: Your over-the-top hyperbole diminishes you credabil;ity. Overstatement gets you no where in advocating your POV.

NO ONE is advocating what you cite.


I have no idea how long victory will take.Just like in any war it will take as long as it takes. And as long as there are still terrorists blowing up innocent people over there we aren't there yet. When the terrorists stand down so will we.

WOKE: There is NO general insurgency. When the US/Iraqi troops enter JIhadi dominated sectors of Iraq, return the communities to normalcy, and allow the mainstraem population to get on with their miserable lives, they are welcomed. Do you think the Iraqi's welcome car-bombs? Keep in mind that the majority of attacks are not aginst the military. They are against the civilian population. Do you actually beleive the majority of Iraqis sek to perpetuate this slaughter?
USAFSS:Funny how countries LOVE LIBERATORS
Graham Chapman:"Yes, because liberators go home again" Let us all pray that departing Iraq following our mission accomplishment will be the case.
woke: C'mon, man. You're offering platitudes, and bumper-sticker slogans! Once again, what form should what you are advocating take. What terms. What outcome? Between whom?
I see the liberals are starting to get pretty emotional. You know liberals if you didn't know deep down that your plan to cut off this country's ability to win this war is not in any way shape or form in the best interests of the United States you wouldn't all be getting so emotionally bent out of shape every time somebody asked you to defend your position.
Woke: Your inability to respond is a microcosim of the issue at hand. The Left attacks the current policy without proposing any alternative aside from bumper-sticker slogans. The Left's, as usual, is simply contraian and totally lacking in strategy options. Cut & run is the Left's policy. No more. No less.
OK. Would you prefer; Deny & Decline. How about Feaful & flighty. Maybe...ajudicate & abdicate. Its all BS semantics. The question at hand is WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE?
woke: Neither the VC nor the NVA weere exploding terror-bombs in Afganisatn, Phillippines, Isreal, Spain, UK, Thailand, Germany, et al. Not a comperable scenrio!
Jihad bullshit all over again...........hoode: To assist you and others in defining who "THEY" are, see the link below:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

No punditry. No polemics. Simply an aggregation of legit news articles from around the world citing the latest actions formented and perpetrated by ( NO not moderate) RADICAL ISLAM. This is the perversion of Islam that FOX focuses on because NO ONE ELSE WILL.
UberTroll | 02.19.07 - 8:03 am | #
claudo:

The people " behind" ( how conspiratorial) it are simply noting main-streram, NONPC, news articles that cite acts of Jihadism around the world. Wake-up to reality.. No punditry. The facts speak for themselvs. Can you handle it? Or, too much reality for you?

No comments:

Total Pageviews