Climate change in this case is politics. Everyone should be scared now and begging the great science of Hoolywood to direct them as to what to do.
Yes Final and volcanic activity can still change the global temperatre today as it did in 1883.
fsharp, the link I posted from Canada was interesting. I don't personally know the scientists but it does appear he is not on the payroll for any corporation or government.
consistent attempt to emphasize uncertainties..
Now there's a revelation.
They do have opinions sharp, they also try to manipulate minds and scare people. Thus all of the talk about day after tomorrow where the movie covers both global warming and global cooling all within two hours.Bottom line is this Al Gore will want tax payers to float the bill here and if Gore and Hollywood believe in it they should pay.
No just FOX newshounds...
a snowflake and most of what you have seen sharp is what? two snowflakes?
Hollywood isn't propaganda ay claudo?
I've made my point.
There's nothing like showing your ingnorance. Great line Chap.
Hey horsey, your a little off on your centuries. Fast forward a few hundred years.
It's Blahgertribe.
Yes and FOX thanks you for watching!!!
Tally Ho.
Here come the hit hounds.. Right on schedule...
Questions! Questions... You have learned well fro FOX news.. Hounds.It's facts folks and Al Gore. The loser of 2000...
Oh you might want to close the Hillary/Youtube blog. It seems it was a affiliate of Obama that is the mastermind.
Kerry 2004...
The popular vote is still 2nd place.More terror attacked were carried out United States soil under Bill Clinton.
Claudo, the concesious amongst those you cite say there are. But you can find hundreds who say there isn't. It's opinion. There are no facts.
And remember, when ice in your glass melts, the water level drops, not increases. Ice displaces more water than water does. So you don't get rising water levels, you get dropping levels.
I can see it now. The environmentalists have come up with a new theory on why the Titanic sank. Global warming broke free the ice burg and set it in the colision path of the great ship. I guess we shouldn't have invented steam ships back then.
The sky is falling. The sky is falling cried chicken little.You won't get Boortz, Hannity or Limbaugh out of their limos. THat's a fact. But they are not preaching about global warming either. So it's not hypocritacal.
Gore is a hypocrit because he uses more energy in one month than the typical family uses all year yet he still tells me I have to use less. Why doesn't he have to use less?And here is an example of why this is bunk. This is from MSNBC.com on Oct 23, 2006. Unedited.
How is listening to blowhards like hannity any different than listening to the hollywood elite who tell you to cut back. Why does melissa etheridge run a video saying take the bus, walk, ride a bike when you damn well know she has never done that?
Remember Global Cooling?
Why scientists find climate change so hard to predict.
By Jerry Adler
Updated: 2:41 p.m. MT Oct 23, 2006
Oct. 23, 2006 - In April, 1975, in an issue mostly taken up with stories about the collapse of the American-backed government of South Vietnam, NEWSWEEK published a small back-page article about a very different kind of disaster. Citing "ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have begun to change dramatically," the magazine warned of an impending "drastic decline in food production." Political disruptions stemming from food shortages could affect "just about every nation on earth." Scientists urged governments to consider emergency action to head off the terrible threat of . . . well, if you had been following the climate-change debates at the time, you'd have known that the threat was: global cooling.
If you are going to tell people to do these things, you should also do them yourself. It's that simple. I tell my son not to steal and I don't do that as a way of setting an example.
I don't mind if people voice opinion. But don't be a hypocrit when doing it. Why is it so hard for liberals to understand this?
It's one article that I found in a 30 second google search and who cares what his credentials are. He wrote the article in 2006. It's not the guy in Newsweek who wrote the article back in 1975.
I love how headstrong everyone is on one particular topic and ar not willing to even explor any alternate theory.
Why is it an issue? Just because Gore said it was? If two harvard scientists disagree on global warming, which one is right? You see, there is no way of knowing. We may have to say I told you so in 30 years. But in 30 years, if we have done nothing and it's not any warmer, then what will you say?
Good point on the aids. I'm not saying global warming is not happening. I'm saying 30 years ago the panic amongst environmentalist was global cooling. Now because of SUVs it's global warming?
IN a nut shell, I want my suv to get better gas milage. Not because I want to save the environment, but because I want to save money.
I want renewable power sources to save money. I want nuclear power to save money. But the environmentalists want us to cut today and want to give nothing to help do that.
Why cant we drill in anwar? Why can't we drill off the coast of Florida? Casto is getting ready to do that. In the short term, we drill for oil in the US and we reduce our dependancy on foreigh oil. Which reduces the opportunity to fund terrorism.
Then, while gas prices drop and people have more cash, we continue to work on other alternatives. One day, in the next generation, we have cars that run on water and solar power. THen we have eliminated most of the problems.
But we can't do nuclear or drill because of the liberal environmentalists. It's that simple. You want an end result today but are willing to do nothing to help get there and we can't just flip a switch and get there that quick.
show me a printed list of all the scientists who say there is global warming and a list of those that say there isnt. No one can do that.
It's all opinion here people. You cite one group on climetology and we can find another group that says the opposit. Who really knows. The discussion in the begining was not on if global warming exists or not. It was on Gore being a hypocrit because of his actions.
It's this simple. If you tell me not to do something and then you still do it, you are a hypocrit. Stated so simply that republicans and democrats can understand it.
It's easy for Al to put this to bed. Start using less energy. Not buying carbon offsets and using green energy. Just use less period. THat's what he wants us to do, so lead by example. Fly commercial, you are not involved in national secrets any more (not taht any vice president really is) so you don't need private jets. Fly with the public and you can even go first class if you like. At least you are on a commercial jet, not a private one.
Oh, and check the news story from early in the week that says you use more energy manufacturing and owning a toyota hybrid than you do a hummer due to the life expenctency. How is this explained?"And what if Al Gore were a republican? I bet that every single one of these trolls would be backing him up 924%. hannity and the rest of the faux idiots would be preaching to their viewers to do their part. "
Absolutely right. Hannity might criticize republican's some. But 99% of his comments are taken directly from the talking points the republicans put out. But there are democrats just like that. Combs is no different, he tows the party line every chance he can.
As a republican (a moderate one because there are definitely liberal issues I agree with like Terri Schivo, abortion, etc)I don't put a lot of emphasis on Hannity because he is a mouthpiece for republicans. oh wait, it's "regan conservitism" as he likes to point out. Limbaugh is just as bad, everything is always the libs fault.
I stick with Boorts, Larry Elder and some others for a more balanced look at thigns.University of Copenhagen Professor Bjarne Andresen, an expert in thermaldynamics, makes a point about the difficulty in assessing the rise in global temperatures:
“It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as complicated as the climate of Earth,” said Andresen, an expert on thermodynamics. “A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the climate”.
He says the currently used method of determining the global temperature—and any conclusion drawn from it—is more political than scientific.
Yes and Al Gore's company can even make it easy and sell them to you.
I can see possibly WELFARE OFFSETS that are provided to the poor or lower income individuals that can't afford a Prius or all those energy saving light bulbs Gore uses.
It simply would not be fair to the poor to not have the opportunity to pollute and buy offsets merely because they can't afford them.
Carbon offsets simply can not be denied because of income.
Anyone know what the tax write off is on carbon offsets.We are all hypocrites. Why worry?
While our HVAC is measured in BTUs, the carbon offsets will be measured in GHTUs.
That is Gore Hypocrisy Thermal Units.
Marty makes more sense than the rest of you.
Saturday, March 24, 2007
How About Some Troll Qoutes! A Conservative symposium on Global Warming. Part Two!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
You know dude,it might be a good thing I wasn't able to post on that topic.
I'd have probably(metaphorically) ripped one of those asshole's heads off and shit sunbeams down his neck.
See how they like that 'global warming',HA!
Post a Comment