We already did invent a reliable, cheap, CO-2 free source of energy that is renewable in the sense that it you can make more fuel than you burn. Newer versions also burn the unwanted waste.
Nuclear Power.
Hopefully with fusion and fusion-fission plants being practical in the future. France has over 50% of it's electric energy already from nukes. USA, Japan 20%.
All the "exciting, alternate energy sources" technologically illiterate people get all rhapsodic about are the same ones that we looked at back in the 70s (except hybrids) and rejected as impractical, too limited, too uneconomic once the engineers, scientists, and bean counters sit down and take a serious look at them.
The Brazil ethanol model only works with cheap government land from cutting down rain forest given over to cane monoculture. Ethnanol and wind farms only work in the USA with massive subsidies and customers forced to buy the still-expensive stuff. And ethanol that "ate up" all US corn crop would only
Solar is a joke. (0.02 Quads)
Biomass from all the paper and forestry industry's waste and trash to energy plants only adds 7 Quads of the 108 quadrillion BTUs of energy consumed in the USA.
Conservation is fine as long as you stop mass immigration and Open Borders. Otherwise, all conservation gains are wiped out. We use 30% less fuel than in 1973, yet burn 20% more thanks to immigrants and immigrants very large families. We are slated to grow from 300 million to 363 million by 2030 and 420 million in 2050, according to US Census projections.
In Memory Of Eileen Tuuri Friend and Co-Blogger. Thank You Eileen...For Everything.
Thursday, March 8, 2007
Cedarford I don't even read it.
I should Have Just called John Edwards a Faggot. That they would have found funny.
Is this the real Count Istvan? Are you taking up for the child killer or just wishing someone dead for their opinions? If they were governemnt officials you could be jailed for those comments!
Jimmie Martin | Homepage | 03.08.07 - 1:07 pm | #
Yeah and if you had half a brain the shit you are addicted to would make sense.
Logic, It Always gets In the Right-Wingers way.
There is a difference between the death of an innocent baby and the death of a convicted murderer. In the past year we have had two corrections officers murdered by "lifers" while performing their duties. If there is no death penalty, what is the punishment and or deterance to keep these murderers from killing again?* Maybe you woould like to forward some of this sites contributions to the Maryland Department of Corrctions widow's fund?
Have a nice day, shop at Wal*Mart!
Zorro ) | 03.08.07 - 4:03 am | #
* Maryland has the death penalty and it didn't deter the death of those two corrections officers right?
Another Pro Lifer No Doubt
unfortunately in FL almost as many people die in jail of natural causes awaiting their execution as actually get executed due to endless appeals. We only manage to execute 2 people a year on average. Not a very cost effective way of handing out "justice".
akmed0 | 03.08.07 - 3:33 am | #
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Bill Clinton, Making Republicans Shat Themsleves 6 years later. Part 2
Liberals have been busy with all of these since Bush took office and they couldn't get over the fact that they lost twice in a row. (little tantrum throwers)
malloy | 03.07.07 - 4:58 pm | #
Speaking of treason, it was good seeing ol' Jane Fonda speaking for your party the other day. And what's John Kerry up to these days? Maybe they can get some publicity pics with some Al Qaeda leaders.
I understand that you think that I'm proving the point of the article we're posting under because I have pointed out the hypocrisy of Democrats not holding their own accountable. Libby will be sentenced soon. He deserves to pay for whatever he did.
malloy | 03.07.07 - 5:03 pm | #
malloy | 03.07.07 - 5:19 pm | #
Yes, everything that happens during an administration is that administration's fault. Katrina(due to Bush's global warming activities), 9/11(this was either described by the left as Bush's doings in order to be able to start a war and get oil as DavidRWoods has stated or just get back at Saddam or due to negligence. It depends on how much you've had to smoke that day.) Walter Reed(Bush should've known bldg. 18 was in disrepair.)
malloy | 03.07.07 - 5:35 pm | #
Yeah, they love us. Just listen to the numerous statements, tapes, and videos they put out. Listen to any speech they give. Just watch the one where Bin Laden is laughing while admitting to what he did on 9/11, and I love the way they show their love while sawing off any American's head they can get ahold of.
malloy | 03.07.07 - 5:57 pm | #
Well, I guess we could have the goal of being led by France, China, Russia, North Korea, or maybe Iran.
malloy | 03.07.07 - 6:00 pm | #
Shit. My cables going out...That Damn Bush!
malloy | 03.07.07 - 6:04 pm | #
Bill Clinton, Making Republicans Shat Themsleves 6 years later.
You must be an idiot if you think anyone on the right was jealous of Clinton and he brought himself down because he couldn't keep his pants up! If he had, maybe he would have gotten Bin Laden and America would not have had to endure 9/11.
Liberalism Stinks | 03.07.07 - 3:24 pm | #Stupid Fox viewers! Clinton is the shining example of the Left. What other pres. could play the sax, high, while gettin' his stick licked! The world viewed him with aawwwwwwwww!
malloy | 03.07.07 - 3:51 pm | #
Liz PbD | 03.07.07 - 3:45 pm | #
You really need to look in the mirror...
We should not forget that Bill Clinton’s first act as president was to fire all the U.S attorneys across the U.S. – an unprecedented act by an American president.
At the time, critics of the president linked the firing to an effort to stave off the prosecution of House Ways and Means Committee chairman Dan Rostenkowski.
But the real truth became clearer as the scandal known as Whitewater unfolded.
The real reason Clinton fired every U.S. attorney was to save himself, not Rostenkowski.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/...19/ 174006.shtml
Liberalism Stinks | 03.07.07 - 3:52 pm | #
I think Bush has tried to play nice with dems too long. If I were him, I would fire every single U.S. attorney named prior to his administration. If Clinton did it, why shouldn't he. We all know if, God forbid, Hillary gets in, she'll do it.
Liberalism Stinks | 03.07.07 - 3:58 pm | #
I don't know, maybe we're thinking that's not what should've been going on in the oval office. I know, we're just judgmental evangelicals, pushing our stupid Christian views on everyone.
malloy | 03.07.07 - 3:59 pm | #
Yes, Republicans do believe our military is important. Unlike Democrats who slash it to the bone until we're sitting there with our pants down (pun intended).malloy | 03.07.07 - 4:11 pm | #
Democrats never get sentenced for anything. They lie their way out!
candyman | 03.07.07 - 4:15 pm | #
Sorry, I stand corrected. But no one in the liberal media at the time took notice.
One of President Clinton’s very first official acts upon taking office in 1993 was to fire every United States attorney then serving — except one, Michael Chertoff
Liberalism Stinks | 03.07.07 - 4:15 pm | #
The comparison being made between Libby and Clinton was lying under oath is lying under oath. I believe Clinton wins hands down on the sex stuff.
malloy | 03.07.07 - 4:17 pm | #
And don't forget those Dems. Stubbs and Barney Frank, who stayed in office and received accolades from their party, while doing much more than Foley's e-mails.
malloy | 03.07.07 - 4:22 pm | #
My Life by Bill Clinton, on the other hand, is pompous piece of junk -- lies and distortions served up with Clinton’s teary-eyed smile, rather than trademark snarl that we’re used to from George Bush.
Since starting the whirlwind publicity tour to promote his autobiography, Clinton has done his best to seem high-minded. He claims to be interested in the "big issues" he faced while in the White House -- the Middle East, Kosovo, health care. But predictably, the headlines about Clinton revolve around the sex scandal that almost drove him from the White House.
No interview or talk show appearance was complete without a somber Clinton recounting how sorry he is for his affair with Monica Lewinsky. This from a man who had the gall to lecture single mothers living in poverty about "morality" and "family values."
But consensual sex in the Oval Office wasn’t a crime. Bill Clinton’s real crime was his part in Corporate America’s war on working people and the poor. His real crime was to continue the U.S. genocide against the Iraqi people with an eight-year-long string of military attacks and a devastating economic blockade.
His real crime was to leave behind a trail of broken promises on all of the programs or stands he promised to take in defense of unions, women’s rights, gays and lesbians, civil rights for African Americans, and on and on.
In his interview with CBS News’ Dan Rather to plug My Life, Clinton claimed that his two great "accomplishments" were "the creation of 22 million jobs" during his presidency and the toppling of Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic after the NATO war. As usual, Clinton’s puffed-up rhetoric had only a passing acquaintance with the truth. The famed job creation of the "Clinton recovery" obscured the fact that large numbers of those jobs were concentrated in low-wage sectors. Corporate America, meanwhile, continued swinging the layoff ax even as it enjoyed record profits.
The 1990s were a bonanza for the super-rich. As liberal economist Lester Thurow wrote halfway through the decade: "No country without a revolution or a military defeat and subsequent occupation has ever experienced such a sharp shift in the distribution of earnings as America has in the last generation."
As for the 1999 NATO war over Kosovo, Clinton claimed that he was unleashing the U.S. military machine to stop the ethnic cleansing of Kosvar Albanians by Serbs. But the NATO slaughter only escalated the refugee crisis in Kosovo.
And when the war ended, Albanians carried out a reverse ethnic cleansing against Serbs in Kosovo -- under the noses of U.S. and other Western "peacekeepers." The dictator Milosevic was overthrown -- but more than a year after the war, and as a result of a mass uprising of ordinary Serbs, not anything that Bill Clinton did.
Clinton’s book and publicity tour are designed to buff the former president’s image -- nothing more. Democrats hope the Clinton hype could inject some excitement into the brain-dead campaign of John Kerry -- who is every bit as conservative as Clinton, but less capable of appearing to be an actual human being when he comes in contact with voters.
The real legacy of Clinton should be an object lesson to anyone willing to put their hopes in Kerry. As Malcolm X liked to say, if you put the Democrats first, they will always put you last.
Liberalism Stinks | 03.07.07 - 4:29 pm | #
I'm not defending Mark Foley's actions anyhow. I'm making the point of what huge differences there are when a Rep. gets busted as compared to a Dem.
malloy | 03.07.07 - 4:33 pm | #
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
A Coulter Cheerleader
I love what Coulter said. Edwards is a faggot. Besides he didn't do shit when he had two Christian-bashing bloggers on his staff. He and his wife can take their moral superiority bullshit and shove it up their collective asses.
Go Annie!!!
Greg | 03.06.07 - 3:31 am
Monday, March 5, 2007
Oh yes I remember when al franken called Bush a Faggott
I think you liberals should clean your own act up before you start whining about Ann Coulter. All we've heard from you people for 6 years now is one long string of ad-hominem attacks against the Bush administration and anybody who supports them. And don't even think of trying your standard retort about how you haven't been smearing President Bush and his supporters because you know damned well that you have been. Whatever goes around comes around liberals. You want to throw mud in people's faces well that's what you're going to get back in return.
Cary | 03.06.07 - 12:26 am | #
No you were banned for being a lying dipshit
*I'll have to take your word for that roachman, seeing as how he can't speak for himself.
Keeping in mind I am still banned, without appeal, from the off topic forums for being "disruptive", the high crime of presenting a subject in a civil manner, with factual substantiation.
I've had comments out here deleted that were within any stated guidelines. Take it as you like.
batvette | 03.05.07 - 1:38 am | #
* credit goes to The Roachman
You sir are a dumb ass
What innocents are you speaking of? The innocent Iranians who are enriching Uranium against the will of the World? The innocent Iraqi insurgents trying to cause trouble between Shiites and Sunnis by blowing up Mosques? Or the innocent Syrians who occupied Lebanon for 15 years until GWB along with Israel pushed them out? Which innocents? BTW, what other country could even have the might to pull off what we have and not lose half of their military or budget? Our economy is still expanding thank you.
You sir are a boob.
SPsRtheDownfallOfTheUS | 03.05.07 - 9:17 pm | #
That's Fine You can Cry all you want too...but don't expect any tears from me
I'm no fan of Dick Cheney, believe me, but just WHY should I not hold that against you? He has said and done some terribly reprehensible things, but when all is said and done, I hope it doesn't get more serious.
Red Sky | 03.05.07 - 5:16 pm | #
Total Pageviews